24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2709  |  回复: 9
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者sjtuliujian将赠送您 5 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sjtuliujian

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投稿IEEE Power Delivery 二审被拒,申诉后主编回复两个选择,不知道该怎么办 已有3人参与

投稿IEEE Power Delivery 二审被拒,申诉主编回复两个选择,如下:
I have examined your paper. There are two options:

1) I can ask the editor to reassess your response, if he still recommend rejection, your paper will be rejected. Note that this is a careful editor.
2) You can re-submit as a new paper per the following information.

If you prefer option 1, let me know.

===
(此段内容其实为主编之前拒稿的decision letter的内容)
We regret to advise you that the Reviewing Committee is unable to accept the subject paper for publication as a PES Transactions paper even with possible revisions as additional research is needed.

The reviewers and editor recognize that the paper may have some contributions. However, the concerns raised by them cannot be addressed with a simple revision. So you are encouraged to conduct further research and improve the writing. If the results are favourable, you may submit the work as a new paper. If you plan to do so, fully address the comments of the reviewers with additional research. As a rule of thumb, we will consider the new submission only AFTER AT LEAST SIXMONTHS of research and revision. Please indicate in the cover letter that the paper was rejected before. If you wish, you can include a response to the reviewercomments in a separate file.
申诉后主编给出的两个选择,一个是他请求编辑再看看,如果编辑还是拒稿,那就拒稿,也表明该编辑比较细心严谨;另一个选择就是重投,但是根据上面的话的意思,似乎要等6个月再投,跟之前拒稿的决定是一样的。本来申诉的目的,就是系统能重投,缩短“6个月”这个期限。不知道怎么办,求助大家,还望相助,不胜感激
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tysmhfh

铜虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
sjtuliujian: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 嗯嗯,谢谢!已经试了一下选择1,主编和编辑商量,给出以新稿件再投的建议,并另选部分专家 2016-03-05 10:55:37
我觉得你要先看看拒你的原因是啥。 如果他们说的没有道理,果断argue。如果他们拒拒在理,而且你无法短时间解决他们的疑问,那么要求在审也没有用啊。
4楼2016-03-05 05:07:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

海南炒粉好吃

铜虫 (正式写手)

如果你等不及,当然是修改后选择1

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2016-03-04 11:15:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

国际科学编辑

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-03-04 11:31:14
如果选择1,很大可能还是拒稿,因为让你补实验、论文重写、包括语言润色都没有做到;
所以建议楼主选择方案2,认真补实验,仔细写文章,然后重投。还有就是换个其他杂志试试。
祝楼主好运!
3楼2016-03-04 11:19:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sjtuliujian

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by 国际科学编辑 at 2016-03-04 11:19:16
如果选择1,很大可能还是拒稿,因为让你补实验、论文重写、包括语言润色都没有做到;
所以建议楼主选择方案2,认真补实验,仔细写文章,然后重投。还有就是换个其他杂志试试。
祝楼主好运!

嗯嗯,非常谢谢,姑且试了一下选择1,主编和编辑商量,给出以新稿件再投的建议,并另选部分专家
5楼2016-03-05 10:54:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见