| 查看: 6733 | 回复: 31 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Scientific Reports的审稿要求,5400个编辑，今年发文预计超2万 已有21人参与
|
|||
|
大家对此垃圾期刊警惕，现有编辑人数超过5400人，国内的近800人。身边很多博后是编辑。 https://www.nature.com/srep/about/editorial-board 2015年发表文章超过1万篇，2016年一月份发文接近2000篇，估计全年达到2.5万篇；影响因子泡沫会急速下降。这货就像是通货膨胀的一个奇葩。 接受了审稿邀请后，系统自动发来如下邮件： Dear Dr XXX, Thank you for agreeing to review the manuscript XXX. Papers published in Scientific Reports should be technically sound and scientifically valid. i.e. the methods must be appropriate and properly conducted, and the conclusions drawn must be fully supported by the data presented. Scientific Reports, unlike other journals published by Nature Publishing Group, does not assess papers based on perceived importance, significance or impact. Referees are not asked to make a judgement on the importance of the study - we ask the scientific community to make this judgement themselves post-publication. The review form will rapidly allow you to provide feedback in the following areas: - Is the paper technically sound? - Are the claims convincing? If not, what further evidence is needed? - Are the claims fully supported by the experimental data? - Are the claims appropriately discussed in the context of previous literature? - If the manuscript is unacceptable in its present form, does the study seem sufficiently promising that the authors should be encouraged to consider a resubmission in the future? In addition to answering the previous questions, you can provide further information as free-text, including comments that may answer the following: - Is the manuscript clearly written? If not, how could it be made more accessible? - Have the authors done themselves justice without overselling their claims? - Have they been fair in their treatment of previous literature? - Have they provided sufficient methodological detail that the experiments could be reproduced? - Is the statistical analysis of the data sound? - Are there any special ethical concerns arising from the use of animals or human subjects? To access the manuscript, review form, and instructions please click on the link below. ... |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
291求调剂
已经有25人回复
-
一志愿北京科技大学085601材料工程英一数二初试总分335求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿北京科技，085601总分305求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
化学工程专硕324分，一志愿中国矿业大学求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
279求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
26年申博
已经有4人回复
-
材料工程322分
已经有5人回复
-
318求调剂，计算材料方向
已经有7人回复
-
292分，材料与化工，申请调剂
已经有20人回复
-
085600 295分求调剂
已经有18人回复
woody196
管理员
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1774.3
- 散金: 2928
- 红花: 22
- 帖子: 1284
- 在线: 141.4小时
- 虫号: 2517758
- 注册: 2013-06-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 植物进化生物学
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
据统计中国人每年给srep贡献5000w呢，关键这个杂志没有什么标准，有的文章质量很好，但是也不乏有比较次的文章，如果不改革一下估计今年肯定要降分了吧！ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
9楼2016-03-03 10:09:47
marineman
实习版主
爱八卦爱生活
- 应助: 486 (硕士)
- 金币: 26028.4
- 散金: 7934
- 红花: 36
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 7782
- 在线: 279.7小时
- 虫号: 255556
- 注册: 2006-05-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 等离子体物理
2楼2016-03-03 07:23:25
大漠西游
实习版主
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 211.4
- 散金: 750
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 129
- 在线: 66.2小时
- 虫号: 4119648
- 注册: 2015-10-05
- 专业: 胶体与界面化学
3楼2016-03-03 07:58:18
hqzhou0817
实习版主
- 应助: 164 (高中生)
- 金币: 496.7
- 散金: 1940
- 红花: 14
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 2211
- 在线: 466小时
- 虫号: 941323
- 注册: 2010-01-12
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
4楼2016-03-03 08:00:48
