24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 6501  |  回复: 31
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

大漠西游

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Scientific Reports的审稿要求,5400个编辑,今年发文预计超2万 已有21人参与

大家对此垃圾期刊警惕,现有编辑人数超过5400人,国内的近800人。身边很多博后是编辑。
https://www.nature.com/srep/about/editorial-board

2015年发表文章超过1万篇,2016年一月份发文接近2000篇,估计全年达到2.5万篇;影响因子泡沫会急速下降。这货就像是通货膨胀的一个奇葩。



接受了审稿邀请后,系统自动发来如下邮件:

Dear Dr XXX,

Thank you for agreeing to review the manuscript XXX.

Papers published in Scientific Reports should be technically sound and scientifically valid. i.e. the methods must be appropriate and properly conducted, and the conclusions drawn must be fully supported by the data presented.

Scientific Reports, unlike other journals published by Nature Publishing Group, does not assess papers based on perceived importance, significance or impact. Referees are not asked to make a judgement on the importance of the study - we ask the scientific community to make this judgement themselves post-publication.

The review form will rapidly allow you to provide feedback in the following areas:

- Is the paper technically sound?
- Are the claims convincing? If not, what further evidence is needed?
- Are the claims fully supported by the experimental data?
- Are the claims appropriately discussed in the context of previous literature?
- If the manuscript is unacceptable in its present form, does the study seem sufficiently promising that the authors should be encouraged to consider a resubmission in the future?

In addition to answering the previous questions, you can provide further information as free-text, including comments that may answer the following:
- Is the manuscript clearly written? If not, how could it be made more accessible?
- Have the authors done themselves justice without overselling their claims?
- Have they been fair in their treatment of previous literature?
- Have they provided sufficient methodological detail that the experiments could be reproduced?
- Is the statistical analysis of the data sound?
- Are there any special ethical concerns arising from the use of animals or human subjects?

To access the manuscript, review form, and instructions please click on the link below.

...
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

Stay hungry, stay foolish!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

国际科学编辑

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
Scientific Reports 正在一步步走向当年PLoS One的老路,目前已然成为国内发表论文的重头杂志。此外,该杂志影响因子5+,再加上打着NPG的旗号,还是深受国内科研人员的喜爱的。
6楼2016-03-03 08:47:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 32 个回答

marineman

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

爱八卦爱生活


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我也审过,稿子太烂,编辑也给拒掉了

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2016-03-03 07:23:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

大漠西游

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by marineman at 2016-03-02 11:23:25
我也审过,稿子太烂,编辑也给拒掉了

要审的稿子是印度阿三的,接受完了看了一下稿子就后悔当初手贱点击接受了。。。
Stay hungry, stay foolish!
3楼2016-03-03 07:58:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hqzhou0817

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
纯粹一个垃圾期刊,赚中国人的钱。很不幸的是,好多中国人以发scientific report 为荣,还特地报道一下。某某所也拿来报道,看样子PRL发到手软了,拿这个来噱头一下。
海纳百川,有容乃大。壁立千仞,无欲则刚!
4楼2016-03-03 08:00:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见