| 查看: 476 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者旮旯里的帅哥将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
数十条审稿意见，唯有这条看不懂！已有1人参与
|
||
|
文章审稿意见回来了，但这条审稿意见看不懂！ In figure legends, authors should provide information on which test is applied to each data set. 请问上面这条审稿意见是什么意思？求助！ 我的 figure legends都是下面这样写的！ Fig. 1. XXXX induces apoptotic death in primary neurons in a concentration-dependent manner. primary neurons were exposed to XXXX (0-0.4 μM) for 24 h. (A) Total cell lysates were subjected to Western blotting using indicated antibodies. The blots were probed for β-actin as a loading control. Similar results were observed in at least three independent experiments. (B) The blots for cleaved-caspase-3 and cleaved-PARP were semi-quantified. (C) Caspase-3/7 activities were detected using Caspase-3/7 Assay Kit. (D) The percentages of live (Q3), early apoptotic (Q4), late apoptotic (Q1) and necrotic cells (Q2) were determined by FACS using annexin-V-FITC/PI staining. The results from a representative experiment are shown. (E) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic DRG neurons by FACS assay. (F) Live cells were detected by counting viable cells using trypan blue exclusion. All quantified data were expressed as mean ± SEM (n =3-5). *p < 0.05, difference with control group. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
环肽的合成
已经有4人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有14人回复
-
研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平
已经有14人回复
-
两类问题算是白选了~
已经有12人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有47人回复
-
with editor 两个月了，什么原因？
已经有14人回复
-
博士论文被抄袭
已经有42人回复
-
25年博士申请
已经有11人回复
-
学硕专硕
已经有4人回复
-
考研，求职还是考编?
已经有24人回复
5