查看: 2562  |  回复: 21
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 ZQXMchong 的 33 个金币 ,回帖就立即获得 1 个金币,每人有 1 次机会
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ZQXMchong

银虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 一小修一拒稿,有必要修改重投吗?

最近投了一篇文章到某期刊上,好不容易送审意见回来了,结果两个外审,一个意见是小修,一个是拒稿,编辑(和我老板关系还不错)无情的拒了,请问如果按照外审意见修改还有重投的希望吗?因为如果重投,可能老板感觉再联系那个熟人编辑没面子,因此最好是大概率能搞定时,这样做意义才大一些,老板才愿意!
----------------------------------------------------
外审一的意见是小修接受,他先是把文章夸一番,之后就是给出了两个可以改进的地方,主要就是加一个指标为了评估毒性,还有就是有一个实验现象,她想了解一下有没有可能是因为另一个小原因导致的,补充一下可能更完整,这两个都很容易解决。

外审二是拒稿,也是先大体评价了一下文章说很有趣,但是后面说文章也有大漏洞,主要就是一个机理的解释,他觉得结论还需要再验证,这个问题感觉很容易解决,因为我们有一些突变体,很容易回答。第二个问题是质疑我们在文章中吹嘘的应用潜能,然后觉得在我们文章中的应用的模型下很难让人感觉到有“应用潜能”但倒是提供了一些改进的建议,用另外的模型说明应用前景也许可以(不得不说大牛的建议的确不错,感觉真心对),这个估计也可以补。其余的问题是一些小问题,包括一些描述不到位的,还有一个他理解错误的地方(这个理解错误导致在4项指标打分中,有一项他觉得因为这个他认为错的错误而原本是该给 high 的仅仅只有中等,另一个是应用性给了中等,其余都是high) 。

而以上这些建议个人觉得应该都是可以改的。但是编辑直接拒稿了。

编辑回信:
Dear xx,
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to be considered for publication in xx and I hope that you and your family are staying healthy in this time. This decision was a tough one, as the referees, who are experts in XX, XX, and XX, and are generally big supporters of your work, are split and have serious reservations about the submission in its current form. Based on the attached reviewers’ comments and my own reading of the work, I regret to inform you that we are unable to accept your manuscript for publication and are offering transfer to XX, another top journal in our field.
The translational aspects of the work were questioned by both referees, with even the positive referee requesting additional animal experiments whereas the negative referee did not evaluate the results as having sufficient selectivity for potential therapeutic intervention. Moreover, they questioned a well-defined mechanism of action relative to your previous work (指的是毒性问题,还是应用性被质疑). I think this is an interesting chemical biology story, but at xx, we are limited to publishing 200 papers a year and have to cover all fields in that limited number, so each study has to garner a high bar of enthusiasm with external referees. For context, each editor is only accepting 2-3 submissions per month and we receive new submissions daily.
At xx we aim to cover the most significant findings, both in terms of novelty and broad relevance, spanning all areas. As fellow academics, we are cognizant of the time and effort to review and revise manuscripts, so papers that are unlikely to pass this high bar, although they may be of good quality, must be turned away. For this reason,  xx will likely reject a high proportion of articles submitted. This decision is not a judgment of the quality of the data or scholarship of the work, but merely reflects our desire to publish only the most influential research and allied fields. Although we regret that a positive recommendation cannot be made in this instance, we do welcome your future submissions to and support of XX.
However, xx is pleased to provide an opportunity to submit your manuscript to xx. The editors at xx encourage you to consider the recommendations received from xx. To have your manuscript files and information copied to a new submission for xx, please see the information below. The editors will evaluate your revised manuscript from a fresh perspective. Please note that submitting your manuscript to the xx does not guarantee acceptance.
Thank you again for your interest in xx. Again, I'm sorry that this current submission wasn't a good match for the journal, but I hope that you can see we give each manuscript serious consideration and try to give transparent feedback on how a decision is made and that you'll consider xx again in the future. We are also happy to receive presubmission inquiries as well.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ZQXMchong

银虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by lovebabyjing at 2020-10-24 14:43:44
我觉得既然是认识的人拒了,那就改投吧。

其实“熟悉”(老板自以为很熟悉)这个关系也很头疼,心想连熟悉的人都据了,说明人家真心不感冒,但是又转念一想,因为是熟人,万一还能通融通融一下,毕竟肯定是按照意见修改的,到时候他们可以觉得容许不容许再投,等于怎么想都有各自的理由!所以头大
6楼2020-10-24 22:06:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 22 个回答

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)



ZQXMchong(金币+1): 谢谢参与
本帖仅楼主可见
3楼2020-10-24 14:43:44
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

li19891108

金虫 (著名写手)



ZQXMchong(金币+1): 谢谢参与
如果和副主编非常熟悉 老板觉得文章质量也够 我觉得可以试试完全按照审稿意见修改完成后重投 但如果想快速发表 感觉转投是个不错的选择 希望有帮助
7楼2020-10-25 02:54:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

小刘的拖鞋

铜虫 (正式写手)



ZQXMchong(金币+1): 谢谢参与
重投就完事儿了

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
9楼2020-10-25 13:09:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
提示: 如果您在30分钟内回复过其他散金贴,则可能无法领取此贴金币
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 我评审论文会去申请人科研之友上查其论文 +5 zju2000 2024-05-01 7/350 2024-05-01 21:25 by arthas_007
[论文投稿] 审稿人一收一拒,编辑给了修 +4 njuyck 2024-04-30 5/250 2024-05-01 17:04 by 落雨风霜
[硕博家园] 大家能不能给点意见啊 +4 是小蚂蚁啦 2024-05-01 11/550 2024-05-01 16:18 by 是小蚂蚁啦
[硕博家园] 失之东隅 收之桑榆 +15 半世迷离 2024-04-27 26/1300 2024-05-01 16:08 by 小小-HH
[考博] 25年博士申请 +10 Changzixuan 2024-04-25 18/900 2024-05-01 14:03 by 318286986
[硕博家园] 小硕盲审没过 +14 xmc2007 2024-04-28 14/700 2024-05-01 12:40 by shadowout
[教师之家] 说同学对待毕业论文不认真后她很不悦 +7 河西夜郎 2024-04-30 9/450 2024-05-01 11:08 by songwz
[硕博家园] 有没有想聊天的 +7 兔跑儿2024 2024-04-27 11/550 2024-05-01 10:12 by 兔跑儿2024
[硕博家园] 科研好难啊,想退学去打工。 +27 byywnyl 2024-04-27 30/1500 2024-05-01 10:04 by zyfgau
[无机/物化] 过氧化氢氧化 10(金币+5) +3 15132328891 2024-04-29 4/200 2024-05-01 08:45 by jiagle
[基金申请] 优青已经开始了么? +5 majunge000 2024-04-27 7/350 2024-05-01 08:35 by XUAAAAA
[考博] 华南理工大学未来技术学院林镇宏教授“能源与碳决策”课题组招收2024级博士生 +3 刘家绮13 2024-04-28 3/150 2024-05-01 01:37 by 梦想研究生
[找工作] 江苏理工学院要慎选 +8 jjchenshui 2024-04-27 10/500 2024-04-30 10:29 by 半生梦君
[分析] C18色谱柱可以分析单糖,二糖,低聚糖(3-7)吗 +5 备安网公 2024-04-26 6/300 2024-04-30 09:25 by shuiliu
[高分子] 水性聚氨酯 +4 钠与水 2024-04-28 6/300 2024-04-29 20:49 by qiyanjie1008
[基金申请] 部委直属研究所(非北京市属单位)报北自然青年基金中的概率会不会很小,有必要报吗? 5+3 拓芙 2024-04-26 6/300 2024-04-29 17:54 by 拓芙
[考研] 312求调剂 +4 平平无奇小Q 2024-04-26 5/250 2024-04-29 07:33 by 晓目崇
[论文投稿] 关于Journal of Crystal Growth的OA和版面费 50+4 席羊羊 2024-04-26 9/450 2024-04-28 22:17 by 席羊羊
[教师之家] 大学直属学院卸任的副院长退休后还享受副处级的养老待遇吗? +6 苏东坡二世 2024-04-27 6/300 2024-04-28 08:35 by ou0551
[考研] 没学上 +7 季向阳 2024-04-26 13/650 2024-04-27 20:38 by 一条咸鱼.
信息提示
请填处理意见