| 查看: 530 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者赛克西曼将赠送您 30 个金币 | ||
[求助]
论文审稿人意见回复，不太清楚意思，请教啊！！
|
||
|
第一次经历，没有什么经验，但是要尊重审稿人意见，对于审稿人意见都是每个单词都不放过的去认真理解，认真修改和回复，但是还是有些意见不太明白，想请教一下： 例如：the authors do not make clear where a non-incremental idea has been added to the paper. To the contrary, it seems that they have carefully combined several well-known ideas (WKNN positioning, SIFT descriptor matching, orientation-aware visual indoor positioning, crowd sourcing) in a single system. 还有：As already said, the quality of the writing is very good, so I see room for getting this published, when the authors make clear a) their single, concise, and non-incremental new idea to be brought into the community (e.g., why should everyone in the community read this paper and not the set of references instead?) and this idea is b) rigidly and completely （严格完整）analyzed with respect to the impact of this idea on the system quality (e.g., what do we learn other than that such a system might have worked at least once?) 真心希望得到指点一下，万分感谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有18人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有7人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有5人回复
-
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平”
已经有6人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有13人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有10人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复