| 查看: 534 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者赛克西曼将赠送您 30 个金币 | ||
[求助]
论文审稿人意见回复，不太清楚意思，请教啊！！
|
||
|
第一次经历，没有什么经验，但是要尊重审稿人意见，对于审稿人意见都是每个单词都不放过的去认真理解，认真修改和回复，但是还是有些意见不太明白，想请教一下： 例如：the authors do not make clear where a non-incremental idea has been added to the paper. To the contrary, it seems that they have carefully combined several well-known ideas (WKNN positioning, SIFT descriptor matching, orientation-aware visual indoor positioning, crowd sourcing) in a single system. 还有：As already said, the quality of the writing is very good, so I see room for getting this published, when the authors make clear a) their single, concise, and non-incremental new idea to be brought into the community (e.g., why should everyone in the community read this paper and not the set of references instead?) and this idea is b) rigidly and completely （严格完整）analyzed with respect to the impact of this idea on the system quality (e.g., what do we learn other than that such a system might have worked at least once?) 真心希望得到指点一下，万分感谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
工科08-机械专硕-求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿苏州大学材料工程（085601）专硕有科研经历三项国奖两个实用型专利一项省级立项
已经有9人回复
-
材料工程302分求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
315求调剂
已经有14人回复
-
307分材料专业求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有11人回复
-
262求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿北京交通大学材料工程总分358求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿青科085500，初试295分，公共课213分
已经有3人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有3人回复
