| 查看: 524 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者赛克西曼将赠送您 30 个金币 | ||
[求助]
论文审稿人意见回复，不太清楚意思，请教啊！！
|
||
|
第一次经历，没有什么经验，但是要尊重审稿人意见，对于审稿人意见都是每个单词都不放过的去认真理解，认真修改和回复，但是还是有些意见不太明白，想请教一下： 例如：the authors do not make clear where a non-incremental idea has been added to the paper. To the contrary, it seems that they have carefully combined several well-known ideas (WKNN positioning, SIFT descriptor matching, orientation-aware visual indoor positioning, crowd sourcing) in a single system. 还有：As already said, the quality of the writing is very good, so I see room for getting this published, when the authors make clear a) their single, concise, and non-incremental new idea to be brought into the community (e.g., why should everyone in the community read this paper and not the set of references instead?) and this idea is b) rigidly and completely （严格完整）analyzed with respect to the impact of this idea on the system quality (e.g., what do we learn other than that such a system might have worked at least once?) 真心希望得到指点一下，万分感谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
招博士
已经有5人回复
-
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？
已经有6人回复
-
救命帖
已经有9人回复
-
青年基金C终止
已经有3人回复
-
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有4人回复
-
限项规定
已经有7人回复
-
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向
已经有3人回复
-
英文综述是否需要润色及查重
已经有5人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复