| 查看: 585 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者赛克西曼将赠送您 30 个金币 | ||
[求助]
论文审稿人意见回复，不太清楚意思，请教啊！！
|
||
|
第一次经历，没有什么经验，但是要尊重审稿人意见，对于审稿人意见都是每个单词都不放过的去认真理解，认真修改和回复，但是还是有些意见不太明白，想请教一下： 例如：the authors do not make clear where a non-incremental idea has been added to the paper. To the contrary, it seems that they have carefully combined several well-known ideas (WKNN positioning, SIFT descriptor matching, orientation-aware visual indoor positioning, crowd sourcing) in a single system. 还有：As already said, the quality of the writing is very good, so I see room for getting this published, when the authors make clear a) their single, concise, and non-incremental new idea to be brought into the community (e.g., why should everyone in the community read this paper and not the set of references instead?) and this idea is b) rigidly and completely （严格完整）analyzed with respect to the impact of this idea on the system quality (e.g., what do we learn other than that such a system might have worked at least once?) 真心希望得到指点一下，万分感谢！！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有12人回复
