| 查看: 532 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者tomsun0305将赠送您 30 个金币 | ||
[求助]
最后了，编辑还不忘提些语言问题，请高手帮忙润色一小段句子
|
||
|
请润色机构润色后按照编辑要求，增加了一段针对估计误差尺度的话，如下： With respect to the error-scale of assessment, objective indices such as CLA in tables 2 and 3 are calculated by DN value of original image or correction image. They are not directly related to the satellite parameters such as GSD, flight height. We primarily used these indices to evaluate the radiometric quality of image with different correction methods. Thus, using the approximated value to the third place after decimal point doesn’t affect the judgments of assessment. 事后，编辑针对这段话提出了一些语言问题，如下： There is an entire paragraph in page 13, which is new, and it appears to have not gone through language editing, because it has multiple errors. "error-scale of assessment" is not the way to write things. "DN value of original image or correction image" has two errors. There is a more language friendly way to write "such as GSD, flight height." and so in "the radiometric quality of image" there is an error, etc... This paragraph must have changed after language editing. You need to make sure that language editing is absolutely done after you make all the scientific corrections. 由于只有7天修改期，怕耽误返回时间不想再返回给润色机构了，求助小木虫，请高手帮忙润色一下，万分感谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
30