| 查看: 2555 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者紫彤3251将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
紫彤3251木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
关于论文给小修审稿意见的回复如何解决
|
|
|
投的journal of electroanalytical chemistry ，投了大概三个多月，据说这个期刊要5个审稿人，但是最终返回只有一个审稿人的意见，见下： Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #3: This study is a mainstream work with no exciting or very original findings. For example changing the OEP from 1.97V to 2.03V when using the reported process of colloidal electrodeposition is not really a significant improvement. Maybe the most important result is the increased lifetime of the new deposits. However the work is carefully carried out and the conclusions are well sound and therefore the manuscript might be published if one doesn't take into account the slight lack of originality. 只有一个审稿人意见，他认为并不是很创新，数据也没有提高太多，但是全文数据较完整所以不考虑一点创新性外是可以发表的，所以我很纠结，因为审稿人没有特别指出某一个点，这个要怎么回复呢？？ 另外 编辑给的回信题头是 Interim Decision 然后里面写With reference to the above manuscript, enclosed (below) you will find comments from the referees' reports, which recommend acceptance, provided that a number of relatively minor modifications are made to the manuscript. Please give these comments careful consideration. 这个临时决定什么意思呢？？？ 给的是小修 但是心里还很忐忑 不知道该怎么改 还有，有没有可能哪天再出来几条审稿意见啊？？？ 望各位大神帮忙解决，小女子这厢有礼了！  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料调剂
已经有11人回复
-
268求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有23人回复
-
283分材料与化工求调剂
已经有28人回复
-
材料科学与工程考研
已经有9人回复
-
化学调剂求助
已经有6人回复
-
387求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
305求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
297求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
求调剂，一志愿北京中医药大学
已经有3人回复
