24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zhengjiak将赠送您 70 个金币

zhengjiak

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 130
帖子: 230
在线: 31.8小时
虫号: 4203045
注册: 2015-11-07
专业: 生态系统生态学

[求助] 文章审稿后被拒已有1人参与

文章i是关于电子鼻判断食品质量的，给了3个人的审稿意见，大家看看我的最严重的问题在哪里啊？该怎么改呢？

Reviewer #1: This paper deals with sensory and microbiological quantity evaluation of fried fish cakes based on an electronic nose system. this research is interesting. but some revisions must be made.

1. the authors should state more detail of EN system design and information.
2. the operation of EN system should be clearly designed.
3. could the authors provide some pictures of fried fish cake? and provide more information of fish cake sample preparation.
4. some important references are not cited in the manuscript. such as professor Wang Ping, Hui Guohua, Wang Jun, etc.

Reviewer #2: This submission presents the use of an E-nose to classify the fish cake samples and to trace the content of TVC based on PCA, PNN, and BPNN. However, there is no novelty showed in the detection methods, signal processing, or data treatment, and the experimental design is just common. Researches about E-nose application in the food quality evaluation spring up in large quantities in recent years.

Comments list below:
1.    P2, L28: "Samples from different storage temperatures could be divided into three microbial quantity classes (fresh, semi-fresh and spoiled)." Based on which standard or criteria, samples could be divided into three classes (fresh, semi-fresh and spoiled)? Also P6, L131.
2.    P2, L30, in which respect, the word "quickly" could be embodied?
3.    P2, L33, Why "PNN did not need training" (also P8, L175)? Fundamental steps for model estabishing should include training and testing. And the results of PNN and BPNN should be given more details.
4.    P3, L45, the sentence should be modified, and also other parts in this manuscript.
5.    P4, L72, the apparatus used here should be introduced, and the number of detected samples should be also introduced in each section.
6.    P4, L79, "PCA" is not suggested here, which can be confused with Principal Component Analysis (also PCA).
7.    P4, L82, the information about the electronic nose company should be given in more details.
8.    P5, L103, the logic here might not be rational here.
9.    P7, L140, the description of R/R0 is not right here.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript needs extensive editing and re-writing.
More details are needed in relation to the total number of samples and replicates used. More details about the chemical composition needs to be added by the authors.
More details are needed in the section related with the development of the classification models, validation method used must be added.
No information was provided in relation to the sensory method used.
The loadings for the PCA must be added and discussed.
（第三个审稿人写的好像有点不太明白，不会真的让我重写吧？）

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗已经有7人回复
申请2026年博士已经有5人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入已经有5人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件已经有6人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果已经有7人回复
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗已经有6人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了已经有7人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有4人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢已经有5人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生已经有6人回复

1楼2016-02-02 13:11:19

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

cloudstrifer

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 7841.1
散金: 8189
红花: 15
帖子: 2207
在线: 19.2小时
虫号: 2946448
注册: 2014-01-24
专业: 信号理论与信号处理

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhengjiak: 金币+30, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-03 19:20:40

第二个审稿意见是比较扎眼的，审稿人认为这篇文章缺乏创新，提到在最近几年电子鼻已有较多的文章和研究。该审稿人的意见比较细，作者按照意见改就行。
第一个审稿人认为作者需要补充一些必要的technical description，比如EN的系统设计等，还有实验的参数等信息需要阐明，此外，审稿人提到一些人的文献，建议在修改稿中一定要把这些人的文章引用。
第三个审稿人，提到re writing，通读他的意见，我的理解是作者文章条理不清晰，文章结构要做到循序渐进，不要啰嗦，力争每一块内容都是对自己主题有所贡献的。这里的rewriting我建议作者抛开原来的稿件，整体的、大局的再次给自己的文章做一个结构上的调整，注意做好承上启下、结论有力。预祝好运高中！

发自小木虫IOS客户端