| 查看: 1722 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 wininghe 的 5 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
wininghe金虫 (职业作家)
|
[交流]
小修提交后的状态
|
||
|
之前的reviewer 都没有问题了。然后编辑说小修后会接受。但是,提交后的状态是awaiting editor in chief assignment 变成awaiting reviewer selection. 难道要找其他人开审? 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
» 猜你喜欢
青椒八年已不青,大家都被折磨成啥样了?
已经有11人回复
限项规定
已经有9人回复
免疫学博士有名额,速联系
已经有4人回复
交叉科学部支持青年基金,对三无青椒是个机会吗?
已经有5人回复
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小?
已经有6人回复
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有5人回复
Fe3O4@SiO2合成
已经有6人回复
青年基金C终止
已经有4人回复
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有4人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生(考核制)—机械、材料、力学方向
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
小修后的文章,提交后状态为reviewers assignment,为啥??
已经有4人回复
小修提交5天了,还是with editor,希望能中,散金100
已经有62人回复
小修后,想催稿,该如何发邮件,重金求助!
已经有31人回复
小修后一直Reviewers Assigned
已经有6人回复
小修提交22天了,还在under review,正常吗?
已经有2人回复
论文小修,提交已经2个月了,还在under review,可不可以给编辑发邮件催一下稿
已经有23人回复
小修后又under review,忐忑等待
已经有39人回复
刚提交一篇小修的论文 (送金币喽)
已经有121人回复
小修后已经两个月了还在under review, 需要催一下么
已经有7人回复
悲剧啊~ 小修后又重新送审
已经有11人回复
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics一审3个月,小修后二审已经过了26天正常吗?
已经有34人回复
小修后一直awaiting reviewer assignment,一月多了,请大家分析下什么情况?
已经有9人回复
小修的文章,目前状态Required Reviews Completed,希望能中
已经有117人回复
文章小修后等待意见,状态是received一周了,中的机会大吗?悬赏2金币
已经有7人回复
文章小修后处于Decision Letter Being Prepared状态
已经有5人回复
求助~~文章小修,导师要求撤销最后一个作者,杂志社来邮件要确认,怎么办理?
已经有22人回复
什么情况???JAP小修后状态求助!!!!!!!!!
已经有5人回复
大修小修后又under review
已经有19人回复
小修后提交2周仍没有消息
已经有8人回复
optical engineering 小修提交后的审稿状态及系统带的图像质量在线测试问题
已经有5人回复
为什么小修后提交一个星期还没回应
已经有4人回复
文章接受后编辑让小修图片,提交一个月后状态一直是with editor
已经有0人回复
5楼2016-05-21 12:21:43
wininghe
金虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5002.1
- 散金: 1001
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 3723
- 在线: 502.6小时
- 虫号: 664714
- 注册: 2008-11-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 社会统计学
|
What does “awaiting reviewer selection” really mean under the “minor revision” scenario? up vote 4 down vote favorite I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript is now "awaiting reviewer selection". Does this entail that the revised manuscript has to go back to the original reviewer for (final) re-review? Or, could it be that it is an automatic status message showing that the editor is now reading/evaluating my revised manuscript and that this does not necessary mean that the revised paper has to go back to the original reviewer? Thanks for your insight in advance. publications peer-review shareimprove this question edited Nov 16 '15 at 11:01 asked Nov 16 '15 at 9:08 NYC10027 321212 3 A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. If the manuscript is only going to be checked by an editor and not by an external reviewer, then, of course, it's in the situation I described --- received and not sent to a reviewer --- but the software's code for this situation --- awaiting reviewer selection --- is completely misleading. – Andreas Blass Nov 16 '15 at 10:34 add a comment 1 Answer active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote accepted Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor. shareimprove this answer answered Nov 16 '15 at 12:36 Kakoli Majumder 2,4741417 Thank you very much for your insight. I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". And then the status automatically changed to "under review". I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. – NYC10027 Nov 16 '15 at 12:50 After having a second thought, I am still a bit confused. If this is the 2nd scenario noted above--that ScholarOne uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor and will only be reviewed by the editor (after the submission of a revised manuscript)--why it does not directly indicate the status "awaiting final (EIC) decision"? – NYC10027 Nov 16 '15 at 13:31 Possibly, the default status does not directly show "awaiting final decision" to give the editor the freedom to send the manuscript for a re-review if the editor feels it is required. Additionally, it might be difficult to have different settings on the tracking system for revised submissions, but I agree that the status "awaiting reviewer selection" can be misleading and there should be another status such as "with editor" to clarify this. – Kakoli Majumder Nov 16 '15 at 14:40 add a comment |
2楼2016-02-01 16:09:02
wininghe
金虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5002.1
- 散金: 1001
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 3723
- 在线: 502.6小时
- 虫号: 664714
- 注册: 2008-11-29
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 社会统计学
4楼2016-02-03 18:29:50













回复此楼