24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wlhsdd将赠送您 5 个金币

wlhsdd

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 259
帖子: 7
在线: 4.4小时
虫号: 3775346
注册: 2015-03-30
专业: 电磁场与波

[求助] 请教这样的审稿意见我需要怎么做

编辑发来的邮件时这样的，review1和review2基本一样，就是下面这个了，我需要进行怎样的修改才可以啊？
> *** Novelty and originality: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper.
(3) Interesting ideas & results (3)

> *** Technical content and correctness: Rate the technical content of the paper (e.g.: completeness of the analysis or simulation study, thoroughness of the treatise, accuracy of the models, etc.), and its correctness.
(3) Valid work but marginal/incremental contribution. (3)

> *** Relevance and Timeliness: Rate the importance and timeliness of the topic addressed in the paper within its area of research
(3) Acceptable (3)

> *** Quality of content presentation: Rate the paper organization, the clearness of text and figures, the completeness and accuracy of references.
(3) Readable, but revision is needed in some parts (3)

> *** Overall Recommendation: Please select the rating for overall recommendation
Accept with no or minor revision (3)

> *** Comments to the author: 1) Please explain your rating with a few sentences, 2) indicate any change that should be made to the paper for acceptance, 3) indicate changes that can improve the quality of the paper.

This paper proposes a tri-band antenna using slot patterns. Three frequency bands are achieved. Analysis of the influence of different types of slots on the current distribution is presented, which explains the mechanism of multi-band resonances of the proposed design.

This paper is recommended for acceptance.

回复此楼