| 查看: 411 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zkm2008将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
[求助]
审稿意见
|
||
|
Comments from the Editors and Reviewers: Reviewer #1: Overall comments Despite very good english the explanation is confusing, so that the overall aim of the paper is not clear, some details are not clear and conclusions are not fully justified. The reader might be left guessing. Points in favour Application of Moire interferometry hole drilling is interesting. A rigorous approaches to calibration are also interesting. Points detracting Some key details are not explained well, so that the overall value of the conclusions is questionable. For this reason I suggest the authors thoroughly revise their paper. Specific points: 1.... 2.... 3.... 审稿人的意见中，Overall comments、Points in favour和Points detracting要不要进行回复？还是只回复后面的Specific points:即可？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
投稿精细化工
已经有6人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有36人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有10人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有9人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有8人回复
-
读博
已经有5人回复
2楼2016-01-28 12:30:36