| ²é¿´: 695 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||||
zclwyqͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÎÄÕÂÉó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´£¬ÓÅ»¯Ìõ¼þʱ£¬¼ì²â²»Í¬Ìõ¼þϵĵ绯ѧÐźÅÖµ£¬ÈçºÎ±£Ö¤ÌØÒìÐÔ£¿ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
ÎÄÕÂСÐÞ£¬Éó¸åÈËÌáÁËÒ»¸öÎÊÌ⣺ In characterizing the optimal condition for detection, it seems that only the sensitivity was considered. How about the specificity, as tradeoff is often seen for these two parameters? ²»ÖªµÀÈçºÎÈ¥»Ø´ð¡£²é¿´µÄËùÓÐÎÄÏ×£¬ÔÚÓÅ»¯Ìõ¼þµÄʱºò£¬¶¼ÊDZ£Ö¤ÁéÃô¶È£¬´ÓÃ»Éæ¼°µ½ÌØÒìÐÔµÄÎÊÌâ¡£ÇóÖú¸÷λ´óÉñ£¬Ó¦¸ÃÈçºÎÈ¥»Ø¸´¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Òâ´óÀû²©ÂåÄáÑÇ´óѧÕÐÆ¸Ñо¿ÖúÀí2Ãû£¨2D²ÄÁÏ/ï®Àë×ÓÓëÄÆÀë×Óµç³Ø·½Ïò£©
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚ̼Á¿×ӵ㿹¾úµÄÑо¿
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ112È˻ظ´
ÄÏ´ó»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÁòËáÄÆÈÜҺŨ¶ÈÓëÃܶÈÇúÏß
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
0703µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
1
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
0703 µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î÷ÄÏij211ÕÐ27½ì²©Ê¿
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
΢¹Û¶¯Á¦Ñ§¼òµ¥ÐÔÔÀíÓÐËÌý˵¹ý£¿
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
SCIҽѧÂÛÎĵÄд×÷¡¢¶¨Î»¼°·¢±í²ßÂÔ·ÖÎö
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø´ðÉñÒ»ÑùµÄÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÌáÎÊ
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÕâÑùµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¸ÃÔõô»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚ¿ÆÑв»µÃ²»Ëµ
ÒѾÓÐ61È˻ظ´
olea
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +513 - Ó¦Öú: 369 (˶ʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.371
- ½ð±Ò: 17697.7
- ºì»¨: 89
- Ìû×Ó: 2364
- ÔÚÏß: 1890.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 210547
- ×¢²á: 2006-03-07
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: µç»¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
zclwyq: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-01-26 18:35:16
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
zclwyq: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-01-26 18:35:16
|
Äã×öµÄʲô¶«Î÷¹þ£¿ Ò»°ãµÄ´«¸ÐÆ÷¼ì²âºóÃæ¶¼»áÓÐselectivity»òÕßspecificityµÄ˵Ã÷£¬²»¹ÜÊÇø¡¢ÃâÒß¡¢ÊÊÅäÌåµÈµÈ¶¼Ö»¶ÔÒ»ÖÖ»òÉÙÁ¿µÄ¼¸ÖÖÓÐÌØÒìÐÔʶ±ð¡£ ±È·½Ëµ¼ì²âϸ°û£¬³ýÁËÄãÑ¡µÄÄÇÖÖϸ°û×ö¼ì²âÒÔÍâÒ»°ãÔÙÑ¡Ôñ¼¸ÖÖÆäËûµÄϸ°û×ö¸ö¶Ô±È£¬±íÃ÷ÄãµÄ´«¸ÐÆ÷Ö»¶ÔÒ»ÖÖÓÐÐźŵÄÏìÓ¦£¬ÊÇÌØÒìÐԵġ£ÆÏÌÑÌÇÖ®ÀàµÄ¾Í·ÅÆäËûµÄÌÇ»òС·Ö×ÓÖ®ÀàµÄµÈµÈ¡£ |
2Â¥2016-01-26 15:51:43
zclwyq
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 544.4
- É¢½ð: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 31
- ÔÚÏß: 18.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3747376
- ×¢²á: 2015-03-18
- רҵ: ϸ°ûÔöÖ³¡¢Éú³¤Óë·Ö»¯
3Â¥2016-01-26 16:56:08
olea
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +513 - Ó¦Öú: 369 (˶ʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.371
- ½ð±Ò: 17697.7
- ºì»¨: 89
- Ìû×Ó: 2364
- ÔÚÏß: 1890.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 210547
- ×¢²á: 2006-03-07
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: µç»¯Ñ§
4Â¥2016-01-26 17:01:56
zclwyq
ͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 544.4
- É¢½ð: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 31
- ÔÚÏß: 18.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3747376
- ×¢²á: 2015-03-18
- רҵ: ϸ°ûÔöÖ³¡¢Éú³¤Óë·Ö»¯
|
ÎÒµÄÌØÒìÐÔʵÑéºÍÓÅ»¯ÊµÑé·Ö¿ªµÄ£¬ÌØÒìÐÔʵÑéÊÒÔÚ×îÓŵÄÌõ¼þϽøÐе쬵«ÊÇÉó¸åÈËÎʵÄÊÇÔÚÓÅ»¯ÊµÑéÖУ¬ÈçºÎÈ¥±£Ö¤¼ì²âµÄÌØÒìÐÔ¡£ÎÒÊÇÕæãÂÁË£¬Î޴ӻشð¡£ÒÔÏÂÊÇÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÔÎÄ£º In characterizing the optimal condition for detection, it seems that only the sensitivity was considered. How about the specificity, as tradeoff is often seen for these two parameters? Also, what were the concentrations of target and H1 used as the fixing parameters? It would be more thorough if explanations are provided for the observed transitions and if these trends are consistent across the changing component concentrations. In the caption of the corresponding figure, it was mentioned ' the error bars represent the standard deviations for each concentration', could you clarify what do you indicate for each concentration? |
5Â¥2016-01-26 17:37:35













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥