9楼: Originally posted by libaozhang at 2016-01-20 20:05:29
sorry，最后一个是strong reject...

11楼: Originally posted by bryantzq at 2016-01-20 20:20:22
这下还可以理解了，当时以为你两个strong accept，我真以为你是来逗我玩的，你意见分歧那么大，当然要rebuttal啊，据说cvpr是不怕你有差的得分，就怕没有好的得分，你都有1分的了...

12楼: Originally posted by libaozhang at 2016-01-20 20:28:16
谢谢！...

13楼: Originally posted by liangtianhe at 2016-01-20 21:10:11
请问你 rebuttal 写的怎么样了？...

14楼: Originally posted by libaozhang at 2016-01-20 23:37:18
还没写，你写了吗？...

16楼: Originally posted by ningjf at 2016-01-26 07:48:20
CVPR评委的要求太高了，我两个weak accept, 一个weak reject，越改越没底了，评委的部题不好回答呀。最好评委的意见是一致的，这样AC容易做决策。如果评委意混合，就挺麻烦的。

17楼: Originally posted by bryantzq at 2016-01-26 10:37:36
你这个还好，有两个帮你说话的，只用反驳一个审稿人，其余审稿人拉拢就行...