| 查看: 424 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者starerma将赠送您 50 个金币 | ||
starerma铜虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
审稿意见求助
|
|
|
各位同仁们,投稿的期刊回复审稿意见了,我做的方向是用纳米材料检测DNA的,可有个问题看不懂啊,求指导,万分感谢! 审稿意见: 3] Method Performance of DNA analysis appears to presented in a meaningful way such as sensitivity. However, authors are asked to elaborate more in terms of common criteria for the general QA protocols with calibration, DL, precision, and so on. All QA-related terms authors show are somewhat qualitative. As they are determining the extent or quantity of targets, all those should be somehow expressed in a more numerical terms rather than % value only for sensitivity for instance. |
» 猜你喜欢
浙江师范大学是怎么坑我的
已经有15人回复
浙江师范大学是怎么坑我的
已经有4人回复
闲聊
已经有6人回复
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有7人回复
求教各位大神:2026教育部人文社科青年基金项目何时公示呀?
已经有6人回复
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有8人回复
科研求助
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
2楼2020-04-27 16:39:17









回复此楼
