| 查看: 2348 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 二飞~~~ 的 4 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
二飞~~~新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
模糊数学方向的硕士论文投哪个sci杂志容易中?
|
||
| 投了一次Fuzzy sets and systems已经被拒，请问大神们有什么好的意见？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
延安大学回应“副教授留绝笔信”：确已离世，正核实举报内容
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有23人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 招聘数学博士、金融数学硕士
已经有7人回复
- 河南省人民政府主办的公办、本科、全日制多科性大学，黄淮学院2011年诚聘英才
已经有21人回复
- 哈尔滨工业大学理学院数学系教师招聘启事
已经有0人回复
9楼2016-01-12 07:53:47
二飞~~~
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 13
- 散金: 6
- 帖子: 14
- 在线: 20.9小时
- 虫号: 3013996
- 注册: 2014-03-03
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 数理逻辑和与计算机相关的
2楼2016-01-07 19:25:13
3楼2016-01-07 19:49:35
二飞~~~
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 13
- 散金: 6
- 帖子: 14
- 在线: 20.9小时
- 虫号: 3013996
- 注册: 2014-03-03
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 数理逻辑和与计算机相关的
|
投稿一个月被拒的，我搜了不知道哪个好中，导师想让投sci，我觉得差不多就行了，这是被拒理由，Reviewers' comments: Please rate the following criteria using only one of the five following words: BAD, WEAK, FAIR, GOOD, EXCELLENT a) Relevance to Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Good b) Originality: Fair c) Significance; usefulness: Fair d) Technical soundness: Weak e) Reference to the related literature: Weak f) Presentation: Weak g) Linguistic quality: Good See attached report Reviewer #2: Dear authors, most of your propositions are based on Lemma 2.2, that is actually a very good and interesting result. Unfortunately, its proof is not presented in the submission, and it can only be found on an accepted (but not published) paper, written in Chinese. If you don't provide a proof of that Lemma, the reader will never be able to assess if your results are correct or not. Other comments: 1 - the paper needs a drastic English revision. It is barely understandable. 2 - the notations you propose are very confusing and not really adapted to the standard literature. Sometimes they change, sometimes are not introduces. 3 - why you only consider the minimum and the Lukasiewicsz t-norms? 4 - It is hard to see the scientific relevance of your proposal. Try to state clearly what is the objective of your paper. |
4楼2016-01-07 20:16:07
