| 查看: 1081 | 回复: 0 | ||
tingquan2011铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请教AO的审稿人意见是什么意思？
|
|
Question 1: Binary SFOGMs method is an effective filtering technique, can the author provide some insights about the error rate or limitation of such method? Especially for high spatial frequency, it is common to have order jump, I can see this method has potential to remove such contents. 前半句是希望我能对这个方法的误差率或者局限性给出见解。 后半句：对于高频光栅来说，有级数跳跃是正常的，“ I can see this method has potential to remove such contents.”这句是什么意思？我自己认为是“我觉得这个方法有移除这个级数跳跃的可能性”？还是有其他意思？ Question 2: The other concern of this method is that, is this algorithm potentially to make data better? For example, in Fig. 9 and 10, it is normal to have spikes at the surface edge, which is a famous “bat wing” effect due to dispersion. But by using the proposed algorithm, it smoothes out this real noise from measurement. 这第一句话是怀疑我有故意使数据变好的可能，还是比较直白的问“这个算法能够潜在的使数据变得更好”？求解 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售T0P一区SCI文章，我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可＋急
已经有5人回复
-
售T0P一区SCI文章，我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可＋急
已经有4人回复
-
售T0P一区SCI文章，我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可＋急
已经有6人回复
-
售T0P一区SCI文章，我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可＋急
已经有6人回复
-
售T0P一区SCI文章，我:8O5.51.O.54,科目齐全,可＋急
已经有8人回复
-
青A35岁以下通知答辩了吗
已经有3人回复
-
【全奖博士/科研助理/博后招生】新加坡南洋理工大学机械与航空航天学院
已经有4人回复
-
有谁可曾问过你过的还好吗？
已经有22人回复
-
E0414, 我的本子有没有希望？
已经有7人回复
-
一篇论文同时出现在两个期刊，一模一样，这算不算学术不端，请各位老师斧正。
已经有12人回复
