| 查看: 1067 | 回复: 0 | ||
tingquan2011铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请教AO的审稿人意见是什么意思？
|
|
Question 1: Binary SFOGMs method is an effective filtering technique, can the author provide some insights about the error rate or limitation of such method? Especially for high spatial frequency, it is common to have order jump, I can see this method has potential to remove such contents. 前半句是希望我能对这个方法的误差率或者局限性给出见解。 后半句：对于高频光栅来说，有级数跳跃是正常的，“ I can see this method has potential to remove such contents.”这句是什么意思？我自己认为是“我觉得这个方法有移除这个级数跳跃的可能性”？还是有其他意思？ Question 2: The other concern of this method is that, is this algorithm potentially to make data better? For example, in Fig. 9 and 10, it is normal to have spikes at the surface edge, which is a famous “bat wing” effect due to dispersion. But by using the proposed algorithm, it smoothes out this real noise from measurement. 这第一句话是怀疑我有故意使数据变好的可能，还是比较直白的问“这个算法能够潜在的使数据变得更好”？求解 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
地球科学部D01口青年基金，最低几A几B几C才能有几率中呀。
已经有3人回复
-
投稿文章被秒拒了
已经有4人回复
-
招收2026级博士生
已经有6人回复
-
宿州学院学报
已经有5人回复
-
博士申请
已经有5人回复
-
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有7人回复
-
论文撤稿了
已经有9人回复
-
化学专业申博
已经有5人回复
-
医学类期刊求推荐
已经有6人回复
