| 查看: 1305 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liehu8979将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
liehu8979新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
求助大牛，诊断性研究审稿人质疑实验的特异性和重复性如何回复
|
|
|
如题，在超声二区的UMB投稿，现在状态是conditional accept pending revision 这是审稿人提出的个人觉得致命的问题，不知如何回复，保住这篇稿In materials and methods, according to your comments, you were not able to perform an intravenous injection in a reproducible manner in rats. This is one of the weakest points in your paper since you were not able to assess blood flow at baseline. Besides the impossibility of assessing the reproducibility of your measurements, you are assuming a lack of difference in local perfusion. You should prove that. For a reliable injection, you should refer to the paper published by Hyvelin et al. in Investigative Radiol in 2013. This strong limitation may play a significant role in the presented results since you are consider three time points only while it might be doable to have two weeks time points for each rat first then each rat can be its own reference instead of considering mean values. This should be part of their discussion. The discussion itself has not been modified despite our previous comments on CEUS specificity, the value of the selected parameters and the limitations of their study. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2024国社科通讯评审
已经有16人回复
-
我标书代码变了
已经有7人回复
-
Nature 11日发文，中国著名学者们称造假迫不得已
已经有6人回复
-
关于2023的收入
已经有35人回复
-
请问事业编制和年薪制冲突吗？
已经有8人回复
-
硕博巨婴，也许才刚刚开始
已经有74人回复
-
初始合伙人来啦！（生物试剂耗材标准品）
已经有14人回复
-
面青地会评时间
已经有6人回复
-
F口信息学部拿面上，大概需要什么样的成果
已经有3人回复
-
每次骚扰女学生的都是院系领导，而不是普通教师，小编们要注意措辞正确
已经有11人回复
hongwen8765
禁虫 (初入文坛)
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2016-01-18 13:30:58
50