| ²é¿´: 8533 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
417910477Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ʹÓÃABAQUS½øÐÐÇüÇú·ÖÎöʱ£¬ÉèÖÃÔÚÌØÕ÷Öµ¸öÊý´ú±íʲôÒâ˼£¿Çë´óÉñ°ï½â´ðÏ£¡
|
| ΪÁËÇó³öÔÚ¾¶ÏòѹÁ¦×÷ÓÃϵÄÇüÇúģ̬£¬ÎÒÏÈÓÃÒ»°ã·ÖÎö¹ý³ÌÖеġ°¾²Á¦£¬Í¨Óá±×÷ΪµÚÒ»·ÖÎö²½£¬È»ºóµÚ¶þ·ÖÎö²½ÎªÇüÇú·ÖÎö²½£¬ÕâÑù¾Í¿ÉÒÔ¿¼ÂÇ·ÇÏßÐÔÁË¡£Ð¡µÜµÄÎÊÌâÊÇ£ºµÚ¶þ²½ÇüÇú·ÖÎöµÄºÉÔØÖ±½Ó´ÓµÚÒ»²½´«µÝÏÂÀ´Âð£¿ÊÔÁËÖ®ºóËã²»³öÀ´£¬³öÏÖDIFFERENTIAL STIFFNESS MATRIX IS COMPLETELY NULL. THE EIGENPROBLEM CANNOT BE SOLVED. IN A *BUCKLE ANALYSIS THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE IS THAT A NONZERO LOADING PATTERN WAS NOT SPECIFIED VIA *BOUNDARY, *CLOAD, *DLOAD, ETC,. Õâ¸ö´íÎó¡£Ö±½ÓÖ»ÓÐÇüÇú·ÖÎö»òÕßÖ»ÓС°¾²Á¦£¬Í¨Óá±·ÖÎö£¬¶¼ÊÇÄÜËã³ö½á¹ûµÄ£¬¾ÍÊÇÁ½²½ºÏÔÚÒ»ÆðÏȺóË㣬¾Í»á³öÏÖÄǸö´íÎó¡£ÇëÎÊÊÇʲôÎÊÌâѽ£¿ÊǺÉÔØÉèÖõÄÎÊÌâÂð£¿Ð»Ð»£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
310Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«Ë«·ÇԺУ¿¼ºË³¬¼¶ÎÞµ×Ïߣ¬Áìµ¼ÐÒÔÖÀÖ»ö£¬½ÌʦÔâÑê¿Ö
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
279ѧ˶ʳƷרҵÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
0831ÉúÒ½¹¤µÚÒ»ÂÖµ÷¼Áʧ°ÜÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢270Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ʳƷÓëÓªÑø£¨0955£©271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
293Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
322Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
272·Ö²ÄÁÏ×ÓÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ50È˻ظ´
1589437911
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 869.7
- É¢½ð: 65
- ºì»¨: 1
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 134
- ÔÚÏß: 20.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2190927
- ×¢²á: 2012-12-17
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Á¦Ñ§
2Â¥2015-11-27 12:50:41













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥