| 查看: 1168 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者bluebluemay将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
bluebluemay金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
写了一篇综述投expert opinion on drug delivery 审稿人意见求助
|
|
|
前段时间写了一篇综述投了expert opinion on drug delivery,编辑已经发来了审稿意见，求助各位大虾帮忙看看，在下第一次投稿，需要多方意见 编辑的邮件里有这么一段话：“Your manuscript entitled "……" which you submitted to Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, has been reviewed. The referee comments are included at the bottom of this letter.The reviews are in general favourable and suggest that, subject to minor revisions, your paper will be suitable for publication. ” 我可以积极地理解么？是否意味接收的可能性很大？ 审稿人的意见中也有“ This review highlights the benefits of nanofiborous structures for various drug delivery applications. Nanofiber fabrication is a hot field due to its cost effectiveness and multitude of potential applications. This article links advances in drug delivery research with those made in electro-spinning of nanofiber structures, emphasizing the role of nanofibrous structures in drug delivery. Overall, the paper is well-written. I would recommend the publication if they address the following points: ” 以及 “ The review introduced the basic method of electrospinning, and focused on the drug delivery application involving controlled and targeted release of bioactive agents, pharmaceutical chemicals, natural extracts, and multiple-drug-loaded system. The authors provided a good number of drug-delivery examples to support the conclusion. ” 还有关于just accepted feature 我该如何回复？自己查过之后觉着不选择just accepted 比较好，求各位经验。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复