| 查看: 3189 | 回复: 59 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
艾斯维尔期刊，论文正在外审，但是发现实验有问题，如何挽救？
|
|||
| 论文现在状态是under review，但是发现论文里的实验数据当时弄错了，弄反了，跟写的论文是矛盾的，如何改正，有挽救的办法吗？？？？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
★
xjw9310(金币+1): 谢谢参与
xjw9310(金币+1): 谢谢参与
| It is OK to do that during revisions,provided that you give a acceptable explanation. I did that once with a paper submitted to one of the top journals in my field. On the 3rd major revision, I wanted to expand a small experiment did by an undergrad tech in our lab. I tried to repeat the previous exp, but failed 3 times. Then I went back to the lab notes and figured out that the data was not corrected interpreted. Since it is one of our key argument in that paper, I had to rewrite almost the whole paper. I explained carefully in the response to reviewers and they did accept it. |
22楼2015-11-19 05:30:09
5楼2015-11-19 00:29:55
6楼2015-11-19 00:35:08
9楼2015-11-19 00:54:56
简单回复
2wei8楼
2015-11-19 00:54
回复
xjw9310(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1 发自小木虫Android客户端
mfp51361810楼
2015-11-19 00:55
回复
xjw9310(金币+1): 谢谢参与
哦 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快12楼
2015-11-19 01:01
回复
xjw9310(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
