| 查看: 850 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
请问润色后是否该重投“crop protection”这个期刊?还是另投?已有1人参与
|
|||
|
投稿后等了一月,编辑拒稿,没有说文章内容如何,直接说,语言不符合期刊要求,给了一个网站,让去那里润色。 想请教发表了sci论文的大侠们,润色是否一定要到‘crop protection’这个刊物制定的网站润色?其他国外润色公司或者国外大学接近专业的博士行吗? 此外,是否应该重投这个杂志?还是另外选择?我的文章题目为:Efficacy of compound extract to tobacco disease and output value in continuous cropping land based on integrated disease strategy。 部分摘要为:To overcome continuous cropping obstacle and control diseases effectively, a joint plant extract was made to be used as synergist and resistance inducer. Greenhouse and field experiments in two years and locations were conducted. Result showed plant extract displayed effective and long-lasting ability to accelerate plan growth and induce disease resistance. Its SOD activity was 27.7% higher than CK, PVY occurrence rate was 61.67% lower than CK, PVY index was 65.4% lower than CK, yield was 5.65% higher than CK, output value was 12.61% higher than CK. By mixing of Chemical agent and plant extract, Combined treatment showed best abilities to control PVY and gain best yield and output value after 5 times application in field condition. Its PVY occurrence rate was 75% lower than CK, PV index was 71.15% lower than CK, yield was 14.53% higher than CK, output value was25.85% higher than CK. This study proved compound plant extract would promote IDM greatly with systematic effect. in continuous cropping area in China. 本小博急等毕业。这类两年四点田间试验加一点酶活、光合色素、光合作用的小文,可选择的刊物不多,又是描述特殊作物。请大侠们给个意见!有帮助则散币。 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有4人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复,还有希望吗
已经有7人回复
压汞仪和BET测气凝胶孔隙率
已经有4人回复
博士申请都是内定的吗?
已经有14人回复
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有13人回复
氨基封端PDMS和HDI反应快速固化
已经有11人回复
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利,现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈?
已经有11人回复
论文投稿求助
已经有4人回复
Applied Surface Science 这个期刊。有哪位虫友投过的能把word模板发给我参考一下嘛
已经有3人回复
投稿精细化工
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
SCI投稿过程总结
已经有124人回复
4楼2015-12-27 03:18:29
2楼2015-10-30 02:29:08
送红花一朵|
问了另外一个常发sci的资深博后,说这还不算直接拒稿。只是英文表达方式确实有问题。我请了一个国外润色公司改了,有修改证明,打算再投过去。我的文章已经有四年多研究基础。透彻研究过目标刊物,它是最合适的。这研究内容在杂志看来是有创新的。田间试验,这类研究内容还就它那最权威。 认真修改文字确实很重要。这次吸取教训。第一次投嘛。润色后文章发来了,让人汗颜,知道了哪里不足。找了两家公司润色,比较。通过比较学习和提高,下次就不会这样茫然了。 谢谢答复我的这位同学。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2015-10-31 12:19:35













回复此楼