| 查看: 2126 | 回复: 11 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者nemott将赠送您 143 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
献上我全部金币，求推荐海外润色机构，能开润色证明，认可度高的 已有5人参与
|
||
|
请大家推荐国外润色机构，能开润色证明，认可度高的； 投的是英国的期刊，出版商是SAGE PS:1、大家觉得我发邮件让编辑推荐个润色机构是否合适 2、第二个审稿人的“Great diagram”是让我把图画大点的意思吗？Great用在这里感觉有点奇怪，没能理解审稿人的意思，请英语好的帮帮忙 大修了一次，返回来的第二次意见还是大修，下面附上第二次的意见。 Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The technical content of the latest revision is very strong. Overall I believe the technical contributions merit publication. However, there are multiple instances where I believe grammar corrections and sentence revisions are needed prior to publication. I have uploaded a pdf document with multiple comments and highlights of text that need improvement. I have put in proposed improvement recommendations in the comments. I have also included in the in text comments instances where additional clarification is requested for specific points. Please see these highlights and comments and take them into consideration for your next round of review. Once they are addressed I believe your paper is ready for acceptance for publication. 第一个审稿人对我的专业领域比较懂，对文章也比较认同，帮我改了很多句子，很感谢他 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author Overall: Technical work appears to be sound, but English writing is poor enough to cause confusing for the reader in several places, along with numerous grammar and usage errors. …… p13, Fig. 6: Great diagram! p13, Fig. 7: Great diagram here, too! …… 第二个审稿人第一次就说过我英语不好（poor），这次又批了一次 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Associate Editor(s)' Comments to Author: Associate Editor: Comments to the Author: While the technical aspects of the paper are quite good the presentation is not. It would be a good idea for a native English speaker to proof read the paper. 编辑让我找个native校对，我想整个证明给编辑个交待，不给第二个审稿人拒我的机会 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
关于filecode，很负责任的告诉大家
已经有7人回复
-
【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向
已经有5人回复
-
关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量
已经有7人回复
-
2026国自然放榜时间
已经有3人回复
-
国基金的申报应该改成非等额制，评价高的钱多评价低的钱少，但是增加资助率
已经有7人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
3楼2015-10-27 12:43:18
2楼2015-10-27 11:33:23
LT_FU
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 110 (高中生)
- 金币: 7173.7
- 散金: 156
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 1009
- 在线: 3099.3小时
- 虫号: 1436839
- 注册: 2011-10-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 力学
4楼2015-10-27 12:56:56
|
第一个审稿人对我的东西很了解，在此次返回的意见中帮我改了很多语法和长句重写，简直是在免费深度润色，估计可能是看到了第二个人批我英语不好……而且之前找过本校的收费英语老师改过，所以现在想找个官方的证明来对编辑有个交待，当然修改质量好就更好了 ，求靠谱推荐啊 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
5楼2015-10-27 13:03:47
