| ²é¿´: 1370 | »Ø¸´: 2 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷ÕßâùÐùСס½«ÔùËÍÄú 5 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
âùÐùСסгæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
¶þÉóÒ»¸öreviewer reject, ÁíÍâÁ½¸öͬÒ⣬editor·¢Óʼþ˵ÓÖÕÒÁ˵Ú4¸öreviewer ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
´ó¼ÒºÃ£¬3Ô·ÝͶÁËÆªpaper£¬Ò»Éóʱreviewer 1½¨Òéreject£¬²¢°ÑÎÄÕÂÅúµÄÒ»ÎÞÊÇ´¦,reviewer2£¬3¶ÔÎÄÕÂµÄÆÀ¼ÛÌØ±ðºÃ£¬ÌáÁËһЩÎÊÌâ¡£editor¸øÁËmajor revision, °´ÕÕreviewerµÄÒâ˼²¹ÊµÑ飬5¸öÔÂÖ®ºóͶ³öÈ¥¡£ÏÖÔÚ¾àµÚ¶þ´ÎͶµÝÓÐ1¸öÔÂÁ㼸Ì죬½ñÌìÊÕµ½editorµÄÓʼþ˵£ºÖ®Ç°µÄreviewersÒâ¼û¶¼Ã»Óб䣬ËùÒÔËûÐÂÔöÁËÒ»¸öreviewer, ½á¹û¿ÉÄÜ»áÍíһЩ³öÀ´¡£ Dear **£º I apologize for the delay in rendering a decision on your revised paper. The initial reviewers continued to have differing opinions on the work, including on technical points, so I have solicited an opinion from a new independent reviewer. This is to inform you that this will take some more time, thank you for your patience. ÒªÌáһϵÄÊÇ£¬ÎÒÃÇ·ÖÎöÁ˾ÜÎÒÃǵÄÄǸöreviewer 1, ¾õµÃËûºÜ¿ÉÄÜÊÇ֮ǰ·¢±íµÄÓëÎÒÃÇÎÄÕ¹۵㲻̫һÑùµÄһƪpaperµÄͨѸ×÷Õß¡£ÔÚdiscussionÀïÒ²¶ÔËûµÄÎÄÕºÍÎÒÃÇÎÄÕµIJ»Í¬×öÁËÌÖÂÛ¡£ ¾ÍÊDz»ÖªµÀeditorµÄÕâ·âÓʼþÎÒÃÇÒª²»Òª»Ø¸´Ò»Ï£¿Èç¹ûÒª»Ø¸´£¬ÊÇ·ñÌáÒ»ÏÂÄÇÆªÓëÎÒÃǹ۵㲻һÖµÄÎÄÕ£¨¼ÙÈçÕâÆªÎÄÕµÄͨѸ×÷ÕßÕæµÄÊÇreviewer 1, editor»á²»»á¿¼ÂDz»²ÉÄÉËûµÄÒâ¼û£¿£© |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
»úе¹¤³Ì264ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
264Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
22408 266Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ43È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
338Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
326·Ö£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»¦9£¬ÇóÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
zhl888
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 26 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3145.5
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 912
- ÔÚÏß: 1410.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1490914
- ×¢²á: 2011-11-14
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔI:½á¹¹¡¢Á¦Ñ§ºÍ
2Â¥2015-10-22 11:00:00
âùÐùСס
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 180
- Ìû×Ó: 8
- ÔÚÏß: 4.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 425485
- ×¢²á: 2007-07-26
- רҵ: ·Ö×ÓÉúÎïѧ
3Â¥2015-10-22 11:15:52














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥