| ²é¿´: 352 | »Ø¸´: 0 | |||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßliaona½«ÔùËÍÄú 20 ¸ö½ð±Ò | |||
liaonaͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Ͷ¸åÇóÖú
|
||
|
×îÐÂͶ¸å£¬ÓÃPLFAÊý¾Ý×öÁËPCA·ÖÎö£¬µ«×¨¼ÒÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÈçÏ£ºPCA is a great method for this type of data but no tangible information is given as to what parameters are associated with each axis. Data interpretation is limited without this knowledge - why are samples separated which PLFA contribute most which substrates contribute the most. Please expand this analysis and the description in the results section. Is it possible to perform a linktree procedure or create an non-metric MDS plot with PLFA data and then relate substrate use to changes in PLFA composition? The authors could do so much more with this data that would make the paper more informative and provide a deeper understanding of their system. ÇóÖú£º linktree procedure or create an non-metric MDS plot with PLFA data£¬ linktree procedure ÊǸöʲô·ÖÎö£¬ non-metric MDS plotÔõô×ö°¡£¡¼±¼±¼± |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Êý¶þÓ¢¶þ348Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸0817»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
0710ÉúÎïѧ336·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
292Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
288Çóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤´ó ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤
ÒѾÓÐ38È˻ظ´
348·Ö»·¾³¹¤³Ì¡¤µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
±¾¿Æ985£¬×¨Òµ0812·Ö336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ295
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
303Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥