| 查看: 627 | 回复: 2 | ||
l348813241铜虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
文献翻译， 求解答。谢谢啦 已有1人参与
|
|
１．Lack of cross-order activity in the remaining 72 families could at least partially be due to absence of cross-order testing considering that 51 of those families were tested against only one order。 ２．Since then, testing has revealed cross-order toxicities in 15 of the 87 families distinguished at the secondary rank that are known to be pesticidal. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有5人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有28人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有8人回复
2楼2015-10-20 23:39:57
baoshanqiu
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 103 (高中生)
- 金币: 15293.5
- 红花: 41
- 帖子: 1611
- 在线: 431.6小时
- 虫号: 3856202
- 注册: 2015-05-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 胃肠道免疫相关疾病
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
l348813241: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2015-10-22 15:46:38
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
l348813241: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2015-10-22 15:46:38
|
1.Lack of cross-order activity in the remaining 72 families could at least partially be due to absence of cross-order testing considering that 51 of those families were tested against only one order。 其余的72科未见跨目活性至少部分是由于没有做跨目测试，因为那些科中的51科仅针对一个目做过测试。 |
3楼2015-10-21 04:35:14