24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 686  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者cgjlove将赠送您 6 个金币

cgjlove

专家顾问 (著名写手)

[求助] 审稿意见求助已有1人参与

投了篇文章,其中有个审稿人说要小修但没有给具体审稿意见,这该怎么修改?,如下,问下我需要邮件问下编辑么?

Referee: 3 (Adjudicator)

Recommendation: Minor revisions

Comments:
Three novel adsorbents were prepared and characterized, this is good, and much better to find an application, such as removal of fluoride. Results seems good and an interesting application was done.
However, minor revisions are necessary.




Additional Questions:
Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : Yes

Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: Yes

Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: Yes

Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: Yes

Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: Yes
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 感谢参与解答 2015-10-16 22:55:02
cgjlove: 金币+4, ★★★很有帮助 2015-10-17 09:45:37

willzhuu

铁虫 (著名写手)

小念520

专家顾问 (文坛精英)


book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2015-10-16 22:55:37
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cgjlove 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见