24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1432  |  回复: 5
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者ybhan将赠送您 5 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ybhan

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] PRB rapid commun已有1人参与

投PRL两轮审稿后被编辑推荐改到PRB,转到PRB rapid commun后得到编辑的回信:
We shall be glad to publish the above manuscript in the Physical
Review.  However, we would like to bring the comments of the
referee to your attention (see below) before we begin processing the paper.

As soon as we receive your response, we will proceed with the
publication of your manuscript.

然后之前审过我PRL稿子的审稿人这次建议PRB regular:
The manuscript is clearly improved in comparison to its previous
versions. The experimental data is adequately discussed and analyzed,
but the interpretation  remains rather speculative. Therefore, I
recommend to publish the manuscript as a regular article in PRB.

编辑却没明确说是不是rapid
请问:Rapid commun 还是regular,哪个可能性大些?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ybhan

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by dk1013 at 2015-10-16 16:27:36
RC is better than regular.

这,我当然知道这个啊,我问的是哪个可能性大些
3楼2015-10-16 16:54:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 6 个回答

dk1013

木虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
RC is better than regular.
到得还来别无事 庐山烟雨浙江潮
2楼2015-10-16 16:27:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dk1013

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by ybhan at 2015-10-16 16:54:00
这,我当然知道这个啊,我问的是哪个可能性大些...

显然regular更大啊
就好比PRL显然比PRB更难
到得还来别无事 庐山烟雨浙江潮
4楼2015-10-16 19:06:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ybhan

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by dk1013 at 2015-10-16 19:06:13
显然regular更大啊
就好比PRL显然比PRB更难...

接受了 是rapid,不过在国内还是只认为是一篇PRB罢了
5楼2015-11-13 22:02:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见