24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 11348  |  回复: 147
【奖励】 本帖被评价110次,作者bio-polymer增加金币 100.25
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

[资源] 经典巨作 《Science of Microscopy》

Science of Microscopy
By Peter W. Hawkes, John C.H. Spence

Publisher:   Springer
Number Of Pages:   1318
Publication Date:   2008-02-14
ISBN-10 / ASIN:   0387252967
ISBN-13 / EAN:   9780387252964
Binding:   Hardcover  
The examination of structure at the microscopic scale, between micrometers and angstrom units, has changed dramatically in recent decades. Many new types of microscopy have emerged, notably the many scanning-probe designs, some of which also allow manipulation of atoms to form wanted structures, while others now permit direct observation of moving proteins in liquids. The traditional electron microscope is being revolutionized by the arrival of aberration correctors and monochromators, which bring the resolution below the Angstrom and electron-volt level. The "laboratory in a microscope" concept is rapidly evolving, as nanostructures are observed forming under controlled conditions at atomic resolution (the carbon nanotube being the most famous recent example). Electron holography and scanning transmission electron microscopy have become indispensable tools of the semiconductor industry. The oldest form of microscopy, optical microscopy, has been rejuvenated by the development of fluorescent, confocal, and two-photon variants. Analytical Scanning X-ray microscopes and Photoemission microscopes at synchrotons now routinely provide spatially resolved electronic structure maps. Tomographic imaging has vastly increased the information content of practically all forms of microscopy, as reflected in the award of a recent Nobel Prize. Molecular biology is benefiting enormously from progress in this technique. Most of these developments are responses to the urgent needs of researchers to characterize new useful nanostructures at the atomic level.
In Science of Microscopy, comprehensive reviews set these innovations in the context of microscopy today. Each contribution presents a form of microscopy or occasionally a microscopic technique, and provides information about the instruments involved and their areas of application. The contributions are written in such a way that the reader can understand how the various instruments function, their strengths and weaknesses, and whether they are suitable for a particular scientific investigation. Science of Microscopy will be an indispensable guide to both a wide range of scientists in university laboratories and to engineers and scientists in industrial R&D

http://rapidshare.com/files/141506961/0387252967.rar

http://www.brsbox.com/filebox/do ... 9bb1b4d313737218d3e

[ Last edited by bio-polymer on 2009-1-10 at 11:39 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhuxiugao

铜虫 (正式写手)


★★★ 三星级,支持鼓励

呵呵,谢谢俺也来赞一个
36楼2008-09-02 22:40:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 148 个回答

njrlfu

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

very useful book, thanks!
3楼2008-09-02 08:49:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

neulilong

木虫之王 (文坛精英)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐



       a new book

thanks
4楼2008-09-02 09:41:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

silica83

金虫 (正式写手)


★★★★★ 五星级,优秀推荐

【评价】★★★★★ (五星级,优秀推荐)
5楼2008-09-02 10:12:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
liminfang8楼
2008-09-02 12:06   回复  
 
☆ 无星级 ★ 一星级 ★★★ 三星级 ★★★★★ 五星级
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
信息提示
请填处理意见