| 查看: 3469 | 回复: 30 | |||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价15次，作者whl0903增加金币 8.75 个 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[资源]
绿宝书的电子版
|
|||
|
电子版用起来特别方便！ [ Last edited by whl0903 on 2008-9-2 at 05:06 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生（3个名额）地质化工冶金领域
已经有3人回复
-
Filecode 又变了，巨变
已经有4人回复
-
分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode
已经有5人回复
-
不应该看fileCode
已经有8人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有26人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有11人回复
-
重要来源：本周末出结果
已经有9人回复
-
我的国基提前知道中了，可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了，怎么会有这样的人
已经有14人回复
-
结合人工智能，周易传统文化，filecode打分制来了，3分以上希望很大。
已经有4人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有11人回复
|
Global patterns of susceptibility for 21 commonly utilized antimicrobial agents tested against 48,440 Enterobacteriaceae in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2001). A total of 48,440 Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected consecutively from patients hospitalized in participant SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program sites in four international regions (Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North America) were tested by reference broth microdilution method against the most commonly used antimicrobial agents. The most active compounds could be divided in 3 groups based on their spectrum of activity. The first group included meropenem and imipenem, with 99.9% susceptibilty (S) rates for the Enterobacteriaceae. The second group includes amikacin (97.3% S) and cefepime (97.2% S); and a third active group had a rank order of susceptibility of: gatifloxacin = levofloxacin (91.7% S) > ceftazidime (91.4% S) > ceftriaxone (91.2% S) > aztreonam (91.1% S) > gentamicin (90.6% S) > piperacillin/tazobactam = ciprofloxacin (90.5% susceptibility). These latter antimicrobial agents presented susceptibility rates of approximately 90% (89.8%-91.7%). Continued resistance surveillance by various programs remain necessary to monitor the in vitro effectiveness of antimicrobial agents currently used in clinical practice.（9） |
18楼2008-11-09 20:47:54
2楼2008-09-02 07:33:48
5楼2008-09-02 17:34:40
7楼2008-09-03 11:05:34
简单回复
wing13443楼
2008-09-02 10:41
回复
谢谢分享！
