24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

freedom2516

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 20 (小学生)
金币: 413.7
帖子: 132
在线: 38.6小时
虫号: 2216127

[交流] 第一次投稿，RSC Advances 两个审稿人一个据稿，一个大修，编辑给了大修的意见

本人前段时间自己写了篇通讯文章，老板看了说写的还可以，但是没有时间帮我修改还有投稿，自己投稿RSC Advances，第一次投稿，昨天编辑给了审稿意见，两个审稿人，一个大修，一个据稿，编辑给了大修的意见，不知道还有没有希望！
下面是编辑回信还有审稿人的意见
TITLE: Facile Route to Synthesize and morphology control of Anionic Waterborne Polyurethane Hollow Microspheres via Self-Crosslinking Reaction
Thank you for your submission to RSC Advances, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.
I have carefully evaluated your manuscript and the reviewers’ reports, and the reports indicate that major revisions are necessary.
Please submit a revised manuscript which addresses all of the reviewers’ comments. Further peer review of your revised manuscript may be needed. When you submit your revised manuscript please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made. Full details of the files you need to submit are listed at the end of this email.

Referee: 1

Recommendation: Major revisions

Comments:
In this paper, a kind of hollow microspheres were prepared by self-crosslinking reaction of waterborne polyurethane (WPU). There are some questions as following:
1) The reaction mechanism of forming hollow microspheres was not clear. It is suggested that author give this reaction mechanism.
2) The diameter of hollow microspheres is not uniform. Could you find a method to control uniform diameter?
3) Which kind of regions that the hollow microspheres could be applied ?

Additional Questions:
Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : No

Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: Yes

Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: No

Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: Yes

Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: No

Referee: 2

Recommendation: Reject

Comments:
Manuscript by Guo et al. describes the preparation of polyurethane hollow microsphere by self-cross linking process which is different from the process published by Li et al for waterborne hollow PU microspheres. The manuscript is well written and describes the research well. I have following suggestions and concerns for the current work:
1. The TEM and SEM images in Figure 1 indicates different size of microspheres. It seems this process doesn’t produce uniform microspheres which is the critical point in this area of research. How do authors compare these results from literature in term of advancement of process?
2. What is the average size of holes in hollow microspheres? It seems holes are not clearly visible from the images. How do you compare holes in your microspheres with similar standing literature ?
3. Figure 3 shows OM images for different carboxyl concentrations which doesn’t say anything. Could you please provide high magnification images to demonstrate that microspheres are not fusing with each other. Please also make sure statics is correct with respect to diameter of polymer microspheres.

Additional Questions:
Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : No

Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: Yes

Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: Yes

Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: No

Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: Yes
前辈们给分析一下

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。已经有5人回复
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿已经有9人回复
遇见不省心的家人很难过已经有23人回复
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）已经有6人回复
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性已经有6人回复
有院领导为了换新车，用横向课题经费买了俩车已经有9人回复
酰胺脱乙酰基已经有13人回复
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗已经有4人回复
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福已经有10人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2015-08-18 09:42:20

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

freedom2516

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 20 (小学生)
金币: 413.7
帖子: 132
在线: 38.6小时
虫号: 2216127

引用回帖:

66楼: Originally posted by 独步青云 at 2015-09-12 08:50:31
只要修回，就会被接受的。你很幸运编辑能够认真评价审稿人的意见，认同你的文章，所以给了大修。现在好多期刊只要有一个拒稿，编辑就会毫不留情地拒稿。因为稿件太多了，好一些的杂志一次拒稿率接近八成了。
...

借你吉言啦

回复此楼