24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4366  |  回复: 71
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

freedom2516

金虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 第一次投稿,RSC Advances 两个审稿人一个据稿,一个大修,编辑给了大修的意见

本人前段时间自己写了篇通讯文章,老板看了说写的还可以,但是没有时间帮我修改还有投稿,自己投稿RSC Advances,第一次投稿,昨天编辑给了审稿意见,两个审稿人,一个大修,一个据稿,编辑给了大修的意见,不知道还有没有希望!
下面是编辑回信还有审稿人的意见
TITLE: Facile Route to Synthesize and morphology control of Anionic Waterborne Polyurethane Hollow Microspheres via Self-Crosslinking Reaction
Thank you for your submission to RSC Advances, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.
I have carefully evaluated your manuscript and the reviewers’ reports, and the reports indicate that major revisions are necessary.
Please submit a revised manuscript which addresses all of the reviewers’ comments. Further peer review of your revised manuscript may be needed. When you submit your revised manuscript please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made. Full details of the files you need to submit are listed at the end of this email.

Referee: 1

Recommendation: Major revisions

Comments:
In this paper, a kind of hollow microspheres were prepared by self-crosslinking reaction of waterborne polyurethane (WPU). There are some questions as following:
1) The reaction mechanism of forming hollow microspheres was not clear. It is suggested that author give this reaction mechanism.
2) The diameter of hollow microspheres is not uniform. Could you find a method to control uniform diameter?
3) Which kind of regions that the hollow microspheres could be applied ?


Additional Questions:
Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : No

Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: Yes

Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: No

Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: Yes

Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: No


Referee: 2

Recommendation: Reject

Comments:
Manuscript by Guo et al. describes the preparation of polyurethane hollow microsphere by self-cross linking process which is different from the process published by Li et al for waterborne hollow PU microspheres. The manuscript is well written and describes the research well. I have following suggestions and concerns for the current work:
1. The TEM and SEM images in Figure 1 indicates different size of microspheres. It seems this process doesn’t produce uniform microspheres which is the critical point in this area of research. How do authors compare these results from literature in term of advancement of process?
2. What is the average size of holes in hollow microspheres? It seems holes are not clearly visible from the images. How do you compare holes in your microspheres with similar standing literature ?
3. Figure 3 shows OM images for different carboxyl concentrations which doesn’t say anything. Could you please provide high magnification images to demonstrate that microspheres are not fusing with each other. Please also make sure statics is correct with respect to diameter of polymer microspheres.

Additional Questions:
Does the work significantly advance the understanding or development in this field? : No

Are the conclusions of the work convincing and sufficiently supported by experimental evidence?: Yes

Is the experimental section sufficiently detailed to allow others to reproduce the work?: Yes

Are the reported claims adequately discussed in the context of the literature?: No

Are the number of tables and figures in the manuscript appropriate and clear?: Yes
前辈们给分析一下
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dong88

银虫 (初入文坛)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
楼主,你的文章接受了吗,修改稿是给了给出审稿意见的这两个审稿人,还是又给了新审稿人,急,我的和你类似。

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
64楼2015-09-12 02:01:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 72 个回答

旋风马

至尊木虫 (知名作家)



freedom2516(金币+2): 谢谢参与
问题不是很严重啊 好好修改一下不就行了啊

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

10楼2015-08-18 09:56:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 jCd0dEvKHShX 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 23:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +4 349506619 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 22:41 by alongwaytogo
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-29 22:27 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[公派出国] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 21:32 by 4qO8zhfjr2AX
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +8 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 16/800 2026-08-29 20:45 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-29 20:18 by 63GmZBFV29mG
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 18:26 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 8/400 2026-08-29 17:22 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +9 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 9/450 2026-08-29 14:41 by hustersqt
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-29 13:51 by jCd0dEvKHShX
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 6/300 2026-08-29 11:51 by jCd0dEvKHShX
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合里面能看到了 +7 一怀馨秋 2026-08-26 7/350 2026-08-26 11:23 by zhaosm1982
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 在坚冰还盖着北海的时候,我看到了怒放的梅花。 (金币+10) +6 ziyangfang 2026-08-25 9/450 2026-08-25 20:26 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
信息提示
请填处理意见