24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者luke13vivid将赠送您 10 个金币

luke13vivid

铜虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 89.5
帖子: 29
在线: 29.3小时
虫号: 2321490
注册: 2013-03-05
性别: GG
专业: 核技术及其应用

[求助] 烦请各位帮忙看下这个回复，重投接受的希望大不大已有3人参与

投的是physics in medicine and biology这个期刊，研究的方向比较小众。
从编辑的回复来看，审稿人似乎只有一个。

Your Paper, submitted to Physics in Medicine and Biology, has now been refereed and the referee report(s) can be found below and/or attached to this message.

We regret to inform you that your Paper is not suitable for publication in Physics in Medicine and Biology in its current form. The changes requested by the referees are substantial and are too significant to warrant a revision of the article in its current form. However, the referee(s) feel that if you rewrite the article as explained in the referee reports, including any further work recommended, it may then be suitable for reconsideration.

If you wish to rewrite your Paper, please take the referee comments fully into account and provide point-by-point responses with a full list of changes. We will treat the rewritten article as a new submission with a new article reference number and it will be peer reviewed again. Although we will go back to the previous referees for their opinion where possible, we may also contact further referees in order to ensure that the rewritten article meets our high quality and interest criteria. If it does not, the new version of the manuscript will be rejected.

You can resubmit your revised manuscript here: （这里给了一个网址）

审稿人的意见归纳为3类：一是技术细节没有交代清楚，审稿人对数据的准确性有疑虑；二是文章中某些内容放错了位置，比如审稿人觉得应该在讨论里的放到了引言的最后一段；三就是语言问题了。

这种情况下是换一个期刊，还是继续重投更效率一些呢？因为明年就要毕业了，时间有些紧张了。

谢谢各位~

回复此楼