| ²é¿´: 330 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
›¤_›¤½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ËÄÑõ»¯ÈýÌú&ORRµÄÎÄÕÂÐÞ¸Ä
|
|
At 1600 rpm, a current density of ~ -5.5 mA/cm2_disk should be observed if the physical constants are inserted into Eq 4 and 5. Why is the expected limiting current observed for Pt/C but not Fe3O4? Could this be a coverage effect? If the limiting current is different from the one predicted by Eq. 4 and 5, how can these equations be valid to extract the number of electrons transferred (3.8)? [ Last edited by ›¤_›¤ on 2015-7-23 at 15:12 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ºÓ±±Å©´óÉúÎïÓëҽҩרҵÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á£¬Ãû¶î³ä×ã
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Æë³¹¤Òµ´óѧ ¹ú¼ÒÖØµãʵÑéÊÒ-ÐÂÄÜÔ´¡¢ï®Àë×Óµç³Ø¡¢²ÄÁÏ¡¢»¯Ñ§·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ253È˻ظ´
һ־Ըǰ4λ´úÂë0703¾ù¿É±¨Ãû-ºÓ±±´óѧ·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§×¨ÒµÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á¿¼Éú
ÒѾÓÐ58È˻ظ´
¡ï¡ï±¬¡ï¡ï0860ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©µ÷¼Á¿¼Éú¿´¹ýÀ´£¬ºÓ±±´óѧ»¯Ñ§Óë²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ñ§Ôº
ÒѾÓÐ86È˻ظ´
½ÜÇà/³¤½ÍŶÓÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÖÐÄÏÁÖÒµ¿Æ¼¼´óѧÂÞÓ·æ½ÌÊÚÍŶÓ2026ÄêÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏÀàµ÷¼ÁÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
µç×ӿƼ¼´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧԺÍõÁˆ½ÌÊÚÄâÕÐÊÕ¹¤³Ì²©Ê¿Ò»Ãû£¨»¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò£©
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
ºþÄÏũҵ´óѧÄÜÔ´²ÄÁÏ´´ÐÂÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ2026»¯Ñ§×¨ÒµÑо¿Éú£¨Ñ§Ë¶£©µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
°Â¶û±¤Xinxin Xiao¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕÒ»Ãû¸ÚÎ»ÖÆ²©Ê¿£¨Ã¸»ùÉúÎïµç»¯Ñ§£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¼ÃÄÏ´óѧ ²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì Àî½ð¿¿ÎÌâ×é ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú2Ãû£¨2026¼¶£©
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥