24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 701  |  回复: 1
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者Letea将赠送您 70 个金币

Letea

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 关于OLED主体材料审稿意见

我是做OLED主体材料理论计算的,前段时间投了一篇杂志,审稿意见刚刚回来,不过有些地方看不太懂,尤其划重点线部分不理解,不知道审稿人具体指的什么,初次投文章没有太多经验,现在对此毫无头绪,非常急躁,非常希望资深者能给我指点一下,真的非常非常感激不尽!!!
ps:审稿意见附在下面
Reviewer #1: This manuscript aims at giving a theoretical insight allowing to rationalize the potentialities of D-A-D compounds as possible candidates for light-emitting devices.

While the overall scientific contribution is of interest for the community, the manuscript needs a thorough proofreading before being considered for publication in your Journal. Indeed, while some minor typographical mistakes do not decrease the readability of the report, the manuscript is absolutely not clear for any reader when technical details are considered. For instance, the authors should rewrite the computational details and state more clearly what are the target states (equilibrium geometries for energy evaluation) of their investigation, and, more importantly, what are the target inter-state transitions that they want to investigate.

More generally, a more precise, rigorous and detailed analysis of the results is required. Similarly, the reader absolutely needs to understand the precise targets of the calculations.

Again, I believe that this contribution reports interesting results for the community, but I cannot recommend it for publication in its present form.

Therefore, unless the manuscript is made more clear for the reader, I am unable to recommend it for publication in Journal of Molecular Modeling.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xjtuxxb2007

银虫 (正式写手)

我是做OLED铱配合物小分子合成和器件性能研究的的,平时论文中也涉及一点理论计算,但是都是别人给计算的,对理论计算了解的不是太多,就不应助了,简单说说我自己的拙见吧。审稿人主要的意见就是论文中有些地方表述不清和单词错误,还有就是划线部分应该是说的没有说明你主要研究哪几个激发态,激发态的对称性优化以及激发态间的跃迁。
2楼2015-07-29 20:09:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Letea 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见