| 查看: 1116 | 回复: 1 | ||||
heated木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
大家帮忙分析一下APL审稿意见
|
|
最近投APL，审稿很快，从投稿开始不到10天就返回两个审稿人意见（一个审稿人不到1小时就返回审稿意见，一个审稿人不到半天返回审稿意见）。编辑的意见如下： Editor's Comments: The major concern of one of the reviewers is the novelty of the investigation and/or of the findings. I would like you to answer to this concerns in your rebuttal, the level of novelty of the manuscript will determine my final decision, i.e. whether the manuscript can be publish in APL or should be transfer to a sister journal. 编辑只发来两个审稿人的Comments to author，没有审稿人的Evaluations。 Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author): The manuscript is interesting enough. A possibility to form xx on xx, as demonstrated in the present work, can be useful for xx. Actually, I found only two ambiguous points to be clarified. First, xxxx(此处省略). Please, give some explanation in the text. Secondly, xxxx(此处省略). It is advisable to comment this. Reviewer #2 (Comments to the Author): This is an interesting topic and the organization of the paper is clear. However, this manuscript contains hardly anything new compared to literature reports. The study of xx can be found in, for example, xx; etc. As for the study of xx, it has been clearly investigated by micro X-ray many years ago. xxx is not particularly new either. 审稿人1的意见比较好答复，关键是审稿人2认为文章没有新东西（我们制备的结构是在硅衬底上，而审稿人提到的之前报道都是做在了GaAs衬底上；我们与之前的报道采用的光学特性分析手段相同，出现的现象也很相似，但借助我们的结构可以将很多功能器件从GaAs衬底移植到硅平台上，从而对硅基光子学有一定的作用） 请各位帮忙分析分析。 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Appl Phys Lett |
» 猜你喜欢
一志愿安徽大学0817化学工程与技术，求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
求材料调剂，一志愿郑州大学289分
已经有3人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有20人回复
-
专硕 351 086100 也是考的材科基 本科也是材料
已经有6人回复
-
085600专硕材料与化工348分求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
085600 295分求调剂
已经有21人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿0817化学工程与技术，求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
271分求调剂学校
已经有3人回复
heated
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 29 (小学生)
- 金币: 3970.1
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 661
- 在线: 296.7小时
- 虫号: 915
- 注册: 2003-03-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 物理电子学
2楼2015-08-02 11:31:17
