24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1143  |  回复: 1
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者wensongsongl将赠送您 10 个金币

wensongsongl

木虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 审稿意见求助已有1人参与

各位站友,最近修回一篇文章,由于有一位作者是企业的职工,编辑给出了两条意见,如下:
We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: ** Co. Ltd,

1.        Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.
“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”
If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.
不太明白这是什么意思,该如何回复??多谢各位!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangth0921

铁虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
期刊不希望有人借发表文章的机会(1)为公司作免费宣传(2)发表对倾向公司利益的数据或结论。有公司人员参与时难以做到“客观”。所以编译要求你提供研究是哪些机构资助的,而且要说明公司参与人员在其中的具体贡献,让编辑可以作出判断。如果是来自官方的资助如国基、省基等,可以默认为不带商业或宣传利益;如果是企业资助的就比较让人怀疑结果的客观性。企业参与人员如果单方面参与测试、提供数据,也值得怀疑。当然这不意味着一定会有问题,但期刊自身要保持中立,自然就会有疑虑。
2楼2015-07-16 15:20:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wensongsongl 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见