| 查看: 4823 | 回复: 27 | ||||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者yizhousan将赠送您 17 个金币 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
yizhousan木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
投CL一审Rejected-Resubmission allowed, 求教从审稿意见来看重投录用概率如何 已有17人参与
|
|||
|
Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author - The paper investigates the noise whitening problem in AF relay protocol. In general the paper is well written and easy to follow. The main contribution in this paper is the application of the widely known whitening technique to AF system. As example, some papers [1,2] studied this problem but with different angles and formulation. The authors need to explain the difference and highlight his contribution clearly. [1] Fan-Shuo Tseng; Min-Yao Chang; Wen-Rong Wu, "Joint Tomlinson–Harashima Source and Linear Relay Precoder Design in Amplify-and-Forward MIMO Relay Systems via MMSE Criterion," Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on , vol.60, no.4, pp.1687,1698, May 2011 [2] Jiayi Zhang; Lie-Liang Yang; Hanzo, L., "Power-Efficient Opportunistic Amplify-and-Forward Single-Relay Aided Multi-User SC-FDMA Uplink," Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2010-Spring), 2010 IEEE 71st , vol., no., pp.1,5, 16-19 May 2010 - In the other hand the author must also cite and discuss the non-coherent modulations AF in his paper where such system can work without NW and without any channel estimator at the receiver side [3, 4] [3 ]Farhadi, G.; Beaulieu, N.C., "A Low Complexity Receiver for Noncoherent Amplify-and-Forward Cooperative Systems," Communications, IEEE Transactions on , vol.58, no.9, pp.2499,2504, September 2010 doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2010.072710.090036 [4] Kaddoum, G.; Parzysz, F.; Shokraneh, F., "Low-complexity amplify-and-forward relaying protocol for non-coherent chaos-based communication system," Communications, IET , vol.8, no.13, pp.2281,2289, September 5 2014 - Finally, by looking carefully to Fig 4 we can see that the improvement is marginal, can the author explain this results by taking into account the additional complexity added to the system compared to the on in reference [5] of the paper - Minor comments: Some typos must be checked After your equations you need to put comma or point Your reference list must be cheeked to follow the IEEE format. In my opinion the paper can be considered after revision Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The authors have tried to introduce an interesting noise whitening scheme applicable to AF relay systems. Having said so, the reviewer would like to share the following. 1. There are good number of grammatical errors and few typos. For instance, missing a ',' prior to 'and', burthen must be burden, page 2/9, lines 45-47 must be rephrased, if a 'which' is not preceded by a ',' then it must be a 'that', words starting with a vowel must be preceded with a 'an' and not 'a', and all the equations must end either with a ',' or '.'. 2. Isnt the assumption on perfect synchronization a very strong assumption? Is it really possible to this perfection? 3. The figures must have the Grid ON. 4. The power delay profiles are exponentially decaying with exp(-0.001l). Please cite some proper reference for this OR explain further. 5. The references must follow IEEE format. 6. The authors must share exactly where does the novelty stand in this work to be acceptable in IEEE Comms Letters. Is the presented work enough quantification to qualify publication in IEEE Comms Letters? Based on the above, the reviewer will be happy to review the revised version. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author In this paper, the authors have proposed a noise whitening scheme in order to improve the performance of receivers in the amplify-and-forward relay systems. The authors have shown that the receiver with the noise whitening processing results in better estimation and detection performance than the original one at medium to high SNR. However, the authors should make following changes in the paper in order to improve the quality of the paper. Specifically, the authors should explain that why the noise whitening receiver performance is worse than the original receiver. Moreover, the authors should provide more references about previous work and compare their proposed scheme with existing work. 请问重投录用概率如何，如果重投修改时需要注意哪些问题。非常感谢各位大牛的帮助！ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 信号及图像处理期刊 | 论文投稿 |
» 本帖@通知
» 猜你喜欢
国自然结果
已经有8人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有8人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有22人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有4人回复
-
8月时间戳变的，举个手。玩一下，释放压力
已经有13人回复
-
我的国基提前知道中了，可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了，怎么会有这样的人
已经有9人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有5人回复
-
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有10人回复
-
据悉今年马上要出结果了
已经有8人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有23人回复
青虫healer
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 18 (小学生)
- 金币: 1129.7
- 散金: 400
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 134
- 在线: 94.3小时
- 虫号: 2617559
- 注册: 2013-08-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子科学
8楼2015-07-16 19:40:22
zbking
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 金币: 10225.9
- 散金: 19
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 875
- 在线: 867.1小时
- 虫号: 2524034
- 注册: 2013-06-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
2楼2015-07-15 19:17:05
zbking
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 金币: 10225.9
- 散金: 19
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 875
- 在线: 867.1小时
- 虫号: 2524034
- 注册: 2013-06-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
3楼2015-07-15 19:23:27
4楼2015-07-15 19:24:34
100