24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者cityengle2609将赠送您 20 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

cityengle2609

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

靠谱青年

应助: 19 (小学生)
金币: 17428
散金: 696
红花: 173
帖子: 1900
在线: 888.6小时
虫号: 909241
注册: 2009-11-22
性别: GG
专业: 有机高分子功能材料

[求助] APL 投稿两小修一拒稿，编辑给大修已有3人参与

各位虫友，我最近投稿一篇到APL，审稿意见如下：
Editor's Comments:
You will need to do a major revision to convince the referee who recommended rejection ta the paper can be published. You will also have ot address the comments of the ohter two reviewers

Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor)
Paper Interesting: Yes
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: N/A
Clear and Error Free: N/A
Conclusions Supported: Yes
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: No
Satisfactory English: N/A
Adequate References: Yes
OVERALL RATING: Very Good

Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Reject
Paper Interesting: No
Original Paper: No
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: No
Clear and Error Free: No
Conclusions Supported: No
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: No
Satisfactory English: Yes
Adequate References: No
OVERALL RATING: Fair
**************This work does not contain sufficient new science and results to warrant its publication in APL. In addition, the results are not carefully analyzed and some of the results lack scientific rigour. In view of this I reject its publication in APL and suggest its submission to a more specialized journal after major revisions.

2. For Fig.1 and also the following figures, how many samples were tested?
In particular, it is difficult to draw any conclusions for the mechanical properties without testing a large number of samples. Why aren't there any error bars on the
data shown in this manuscript? What is the meaning of the electrical and mechanical data in the absence of error bars?
4. Overall, I see that the authors draw conclusions about an eventual increase in the electromechanical characteristics. How significant are these increases if you take into account variations in samples, errors in the measurements, etc...? It would be also more interesting to analyze the data more carefully rather than only reporting the behaviors seen in each plot.
5. Reference list is not accurate and requires appropriate referencing of the earlier studies contacted by other groups in the field.

Reviewer #3 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor)
Paper Interesting: Yes
Original Paper: Yes
Sufficient Physics: Yes
Well Organized: Yes
Clear and Error Free: Yes
Conclusions Supported: No
Appropriate Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: Yes
Satisfactory English: Yes
Adequate References: Yes
OVERALL RATING: Very Good

总的来说，审稿人一和三的审稿意见还是很好回复的。关键是这个审稿人二，问题无非是觉着工作不够原创，没啥料；再就是认为数据没用error bar, 可靠性不大。在我看过的很多论文里，不用error bar 的也不在少数，而且我也的确不知道该如何做error bar。

还请给位虫友指教。多谢

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

Appl Phys Lett

» 猜你喜欢

药学硕士，第一、第二作者已发表6 篇 SCI，药理方向及相关方向2026年/2027年博士申请已经有4人回复
26年博士申请自荐-电催化已经有3人回复
中国地质大学（北京）博士招生补录，数理学院材料科学与工程专业和材料与化工专业已经有6人回复
收到国自然专家邀请后几年才会有本子送过来评已经有4人回复
考博已经有5人回复
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉已经有4人回复
药化及相关博士的申请已经有3人回复
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活已经有4人回复

要么旅行，要么读书，身体和灵魂总要有一个在路上

1楼 2015-07-15 10:34:38

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

cityengle2609

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

靠谱青年

应助: 19 (小学生)
金币: 17428
散金: 696
红花: 173
帖子: 1900
在线: 888.6小时
虫号: 909241
注册: 2009-11-22
性别: GG
专业: 有机高分子功能材料

引用回帖:

8楼: Originally posted by Odyssey1989 at 2015-07-22 21:46:21
如果第二个审稿人只写了这么些话的话，有些类似编辑模版拒稿的感觉。

但由于另外两个审稿意见都挺正面的，所以楼主的文章应该不想审稿人二号所说的毫无创新。而且目测审稿人二号提的这几个问题毫无深度。。

所 ...

谢谢你

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]

回复此楼