| 查看: 2467 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者cityengle2609将赠送您 20 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
cityengle2609至尊木虫 (著名写手)
靠谱青年
|
[求助]
APL 投稿两小修一拒稿，编辑给大修 已有3人参与
|
||
|
各位虫友，我最近投稿一篇到APL，审稿意见如下： Editor's Comments: You will need to do a major revision to convince the referee who recommended rejection ta the paper can be published. You will also have ot address the comments of the ohter two reviewers Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor) Paper Interesting: Yes Original Paper: Yes Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized: N/A Clear and Error Free: N/A Conclusions Supported: Yes Appropriate Title: Yes Good Abstract: Yes Clear Figures: No Satisfactory English: N/A Adequate References: Yes OVERALL RATING: Very Good Reviewer #2 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Reject Paper Interesting: No Original Paper: No Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized: No Clear and Error Free: No Conclusions Supported: No Appropriate Title: Yes Good Abstract: Yes Clear Figures: No Satisfactory English: Yes Adequate References: No OVERALL RATING: Fair **************This work does not contain sufficient new science and results to warrant its publication in APL. In addition, the results are not carefully analyzed and some of the results lack scientific rigour. In view of this I reject its publication in APL and suggest its submission to a more specialized journal after major revisions. 2. For Fig.1 and also the following figures, how many samples were tested? In particular, it is difficult to draw any conclusions for the mechanical properties without testing a large number of samples. Why aren't there any error bars on the data shown in this manuscript? What is the meaning of the electrical and mechanical data in the absence of error bars? 4. Overall, I see that the authors draw conclusions about an eventual increase in the electromechanical characteristics. How significant are these increases if you take into account variations in samples, errors in the measurements, etc...? It would be also more interesting to analyze the data more carefully rather than only reporting the behaviors seen in each plot. 5. Reference list is not accurate and requires appropriate referencing of the earlier studies contacted by other groups in the field. Reviewer #3 Evaluations: RECOMMENDATION: Publish in APL with mandatory revision (minor) Paper Interesting: Yes Original Paper: Yes Sufficient Physics: Yes Well Organized: Yes Clear and Error Free: Yes Conclusions Supported: No Appropriate Title: Yes Good Abstract: Yes Clear Figures: Yes Satisfactory English: Yes Adequate References: Yes OVERALL RATING: Very Good 总的来说，审稿人一和三的审稿意见还是很好回复的。关键是这个审稿人二，问题无非是觉着工作不够原创，没啥料；再就是认为数据没用error bar, 可靠性不大。在我看过的很多论文里，不用error bar 的也不在少数，而且我也的确不知道该如何做error bar。 还请给位虫友指教。多谢 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Appl Phys Lett |
» 猜你喜欢
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有7人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有4人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
cityengle2609
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
靠谱青年
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 金币: 17423.2
- 散金: 696
- 红花: 173
- 帖子: 1900
- 在线: 888.1小时
- 虫号: 909241
- 注册: 2009-11-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机高分子功能材料
9楼2015-07-23 01:15:25
|
额 [ 发自小木虫客户端 ] |
2楼2015-07-15 12:04:36
UTKProgress
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3605.5
- 散金: 7
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 280
- 在线: 236.4小时
- 虫号: 3500502
- 注册: 2014-10-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
3楼2015-07-17 11:44:06
4楼2015-07-22 15:29:55