| 查看: 489 | 回复: 0 | |||
yy273826987金虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
Peer reviewers can now get credit! 建议大伙试试这个体系。
|
|
Generally, reviewing papers or manuscripts for most of the journals is for free. You read the manuscripts, check whether they have issues, write down your comments, and send them to the editorial office. And, that's it. You would't get paid. Of cause, you can write down your reviewing history in your CV but it is relatively hard for others to know whether you have actually reviewed those papers. Now, there launched a relatively new system called Publons. Which will give you credit for your review work. You need to tell them how many articles you have reviewed and after verification (they will contact the editors to see if you have actually reviewed those papers) they will give you credit. Here is the introduction from the website: ============================== Giving credit for peer review allows researchers to build their academic reputation through their peer review activity. The hypothesis is that when reviewers get official recognition for their work, they are more willing to accept review requests, more willing to prioritise time to do the review quicker, and more likely to do a comprehensive review. In short, they are more willing to put aside their own research to selflessly help with someone else's. =============================== More information and instructions can be found at: 1. https://www.editage.cn/insights/ ... -up-science-publons 2. https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-834562.html 3. https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-834562.html I suggest those who have already reviewed papers for peer review journals try this system. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士延得我，科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
-
退学或坚持读
已经有27人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
-
有70后还继续奋斗在职场上的吗？
已经有5人回复
-
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
-
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
