| 查看: 494 | 回复: 0 | |||
yy273826987金虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
Peer reviewers can now get credit! 建议大伙试试这个体系。
|
|
Generally, reviewing papers or manuscripts for most of the journals is for free. You read the manuscripts, check whether they have issues, write down your comments, and send them to the editorial office. And, that's it. You would't get paid. Of cause, you can write down your reviewing history in your CV but it is relatively hard for others to know whether you have actually reviewed those papers. Now, there launched a relatively new system called Publons. Which will give you credit for your review work. You need to tell them how many articles you have reviewed and after verification (they will contact the editors to see if you have actually reviewed those papers) they will give you credit. Here is the introduction from the website: ============================== Giving credit for peer review allows researchers to build their academic reputation through their peer review activity. The hypothesis is that when reviewers get official recognition for their work, they are more willing to accept review requests, more willing to prioritise time to do the review quicker, and more likely to do a comprehensive review. In short, they are more willing to put aside their own research to selflessly help with someone else's. =============================== More information and instructions can be found at: 1. https://www.editage.cn/insights/ ... -up-science-publons 2. https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-834562.html 3. https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-41174-834562.html I suggest those who have already reviewed papers for peer review journals try this system. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有7人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有17人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有19人回复
-
【博士招生】太原理工大学2026化工博士
已经有8人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有12人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有11人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有9人回复
