| 查看: 6098 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者对马拉二胡将赠送您 35 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
对马拉二胡至尊木虫 (职业作家)
|
[求助]
PRL投稿求助 已有5人参与
|
||
|
第一次投稿，编辑回复意见如下 We have considered your manuscript and conclude that it is not suited for Physical Review Letters. We make no judgment on the correctness or technical aspects of your work. However, from our understanding of the paper's physics results, context, and motivation, we conclude that your paper does not meet the Physical Review Letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest. Our criteria require a clear justification for consideration of the paper by PRL, rather than by a specialized journal. Your work appears better suited for submittal to the latter. [Please see our recent editorial https://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 (2013).] In view of our assessment, we are not sending your manuscript out for review. We might consider a revised version of your paper, but only if it makes a transparent and compelling case for publication in PRL, as opposed to a more specialized journal. If a version arrives that makes this case well, we may decide that anonymous review is warranted. If we continue to find the manuscript unsuitable for review, possibly following input from a Divisional Associate Editor, we will inform you promptly. Yours sincerely, Samindranath Mitra Editor Physical Review Letters Email: prl@aps.org https://journals.aps.org/prl/ IMPORTANT: Editorial "Review Changes" https://journals.aps.org/prl/edannounce/PhysRevLett.111.180001 PROBLEMS WITH MANUSCRIPT: The following problems were noted in your manuscript. * We prefer figures to be submitted electronically for all manuscripts. Our file preference is PostScript or Encapsulated PostScript (EPS). Each electronic figure (or well-separated figure part) should be contained in a separate file and clearly labeled. For Word and PDF submissions, all textual material AND figures should be in a single file but we do need separate electronic figure files as well for production purposes. PostScript files should print correctly on a PostScript printer that has not had any fonts or scripts downloaded to it. See https://journals.aps.org/authors ... nes-physical-review for further details. 请问各位大神该怎么办？ |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 Phys Rev Lett |
» 猜你喜欢
NSFC申报书里申请人简历中代表性论著还需要在申报书最后的附件里面再上传一遍吗
已经有14人回复
-
材料与化工一志愿南昌大学327求调剂推荐
已经有6人回复
-
化学调剂0703
已经有7人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
调剂
已经有8人回复
-
梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入
已经有7人回复
-
伙伴们，祝我生日快乐吧
已经有24人回复
-
中科院材料273求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料工程专硕274一志愿211求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
本人考085602 化学工程 专硕
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- PRL投稿问题（latex)
已经有3人回复
- PRL投稿的具体步骤什么啊？
已经有8人回复
- PRL 投稿-2013
已经有22人回复
- PRL投稿问题，急急急！！！
已经有4人回复
- PRL这样回复，还可以再投吗？
已经有30人回复
- PRL投稿1周，还没送审，忐忑ing
已经有9人回复
- PRL审稿后的问题
已经有4人回复
- PRL中插入的图片格式有什么要求啊？
已经有4人回复
- 请问在哪可以下载到PRL的封面？
已经有5人回复
- PRL argue Letter 怎么递交？
已经有8人回复
- 有关PRL的投稿状态
已经有23人回复
- 请问PRL的投稿状态
已经有3人回复
- 请问这种情况是不是prl已送审？第一次投，没经验
已经有9人回复
- PRL编辑的意见
已经有6人回复
- 投PRL的文章都送5个审稿人了，有没有强人看看这是怎么回事？
已经有16人回复
- 有经验的帮忙看看PRL的这封意见如何回复
已经有8人回复
- PRL编辑直接拒稿的概率大么
已经有5人回复
- JACS或PRL的二作 与 JCP或PRB之类的一作 相比，哪个更好呢？
已经有30人回复
- 请教PRL的投稿状态
已经有8人回复
magicmonk
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 172 (高中生)
- 金币: 11451.3
- 红花: 24
- 帖子: 1124
- 在线: 3108.8小时
- 虫号: 1191315
- 注册: 2011-01-17
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
5楼2015-07-08 09:33:46
2楼2015-07-08 08:34:53
对马拉二胡
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 27 (小学生)
- 金币: 25905.6
- 散金: 244
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 4063
- 在线: 938小时
- 虫号: 2471734
- 注册: 2013-05-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机非金属材料
3楼2015-07-08 08:40:27
4楼2015-07-08 08:47:14
