24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 161  |  回复: 1
当前主题已经存档。

xybi7683

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Nanoparticles In Sewage Could Escape Into Bodies Of Water

网上看到的,希望对大家有所启发!

In a conventional sewage works, nanoparticles should really be bound in the sludge and should not represent a major problem in the aqueous effluent. This is not true, however, as shown by a new study of the ceramic model material cerium dioxide. An astonishing amount was able to leave an experimental sewage works and thus could possibly enter bodies of water.

The industry needs large amounts of cerium dioxide (CeO2) to grind computer components and mobile phone camera lenses or the lasers in CD players. Thousands of tons of this substance are used throughout the world. But what happens when this or other nano-substances get into the environment, especially sewage, and thereby enter sewage works? Is the problem solved because nanoparticles largely agglomerate, i.e. clump together?
Particles survive unbound
Not at all, according to a new study by the research group led by Wendelin Stark, Assistant Professor at the Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, which has just appeared in the journal “Environmental Science and Technology”. The majority of the cerium dioxide particles actually do bond to the surface of bacteria in the sewage sludge and can thus be removed from the water.
However, far more particles than was assumed are able to pass through the biological separation stage. Stark says, “Intuitively, we presumed that practically 100 percent of the cerium oxide particles would remain trapped in the sewage sludge. After all, the particles should form clumps and sink to the bottom.” Therefore at the start of the project they had thought that all the particles could simply be precipitated out.
However, through numerous experiments in a test sewage plant, the scientists discovered that up to six percent by weight of the particles entered the sewage works effluent. Since the experiments were carried out at relatively high nanoparticle concentrations (100 ppm), the researchers suspect that agglomeration, i.e. clumping together, is likely to be impeded even more at lower concentrations. Therefore oxide nanoparticles that get into the effluent must not be regarded as unproblematic, because the route taken by the particles after the sewage works has scarcely been researched up to now.
Bacteria help nanoparticles
The researchers at ETH Zurich, the University of Applied Sciences Wädenswil and the BMG Engineering AG Company then began a series of experiments to find out how the oxide nanoparticles pass through the sewage plant almost unimpeded. Here again, the resear¬chers met with a surprise. Stark stresses that, “The particles disperse astonishingly well and do not agglomerate entirely as was assumed.” The bacteria living in the activated sludge involuntarily share responsibility for this dispersion. They excrete soap-like substances to avoid forming clumps with one another. However, these anti-clumping agents and other components of the aqueous effluent also stabilise the nanoparticles. Thus a proportion of the material is not sufficiently agglomerated and can leave the sewage works practically unchanged.
For Wendelin Stark, this research work is a stroke of luck from which all the participants have profited greatly. The work arose from an initiative by co-author Robert Bereiter, a member of the staff of the University of Applied Sciences Wädenswil, and René Gälli of BMG Engineering. The researchers were able to carry out the tests in the company’s own experimental sewage plant under real conditions and in accordance with OECD standards. The sewage sludge for the experiments originated from the activated sludge tanks of the Werdhölzli plant, Zurich’s biggest sewage works.
Disposed of with the sewage sludge
Elisabeth Müller and Roger Wepf from the Electron Microscopy Centre (EMEZ) of ETH Zurich prepared electron microscope images of sewage sludge with nanoparticles, showing impressively that the nanoparticles accumulate at the surface of the bacteria. At the same time, a large proportion of the nanoparticles remains in the sewage sludge. In Switzerland this sludge is incinerated, but in other countries it is still used as fertiliser.
Cerium dioxide is a popular model compound for studies of this kind, and is also used industrially in rapidly increasing amounts. Titanium oxide, a white pigment and an ingredient in many suncreams, behaves in a similar way to cerium dioxide and is already used in huge quantities. Under the experimental conditions both substances are stabilised in a way similar to that in a sewage works. Other soluble nanoparticles, e.g. iron oxide, are stabilised to a distinctly lesser extent. This is why they are also easier to remove from the environment. Wendelin Stark says, “However, we are still at the beginning of nano-safety research. Further investigations must follow.”

Journal reference:
Limbach et al. Removal of Oxide Nanoparticles in a Model Wastewater Treatment Plant: Influence of Agglomeration and Surfactants on Clearing Efficiency. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008; 0 (0): 0 DOI: 10.1021/es800091f
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangxiaomuchong

新虫 (初入文坛)

什么玩意忽悠人啊?直接弄个文件我们下载不行啊,真麻烦
2楼2008-07-30 13:55:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xybi7683 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分? +11 yufeiwaner 2026-08-09 13/650 2026-08-12 08:17 by yufeiwaner
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +7 布布和一二 2026-08-10 9/450 2026-08-11 22:12 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊 +8 Tide man 2026-08-10 9/450 2026-08-11 20:39 by beefly
[基金申请] 有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验) +3 majunge000 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-11 20:13 by lch2012
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 19:25 by Tide man
[基金申请] 什么时候出结果,有咨询渠道??? +3 Tide man 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 17:54 by kudofaye
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +3 布布和一二 2026-08-11 4/200 2026-08-11 15:20 by aasahr
[论文投稿] 职称评审,求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊 +3 工厂打螺丝 2026-08-08 3/150 2026-08-11 13:42 by 会议编辑
[基金申请] FileCode能看出啥? +7 要乐观耀哥 2026-08-10 17/850 2026-08-11 10:50 by 要乐观耀哥
[基金申请] 基金中了 +15 laoda193707 2026-08-06 15/750 2026-08-11 00:11 by jiafei2190
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +3 majunge000 2026-08-10 3/150 2026-08-10 15:46 by lch2012
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量 +5 yang182083 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-08 18:29 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] 大家散了吧,后缀研究没有意义,别浪费时间了,过好目前的每一天,不要焦虑 +5 Tide man 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-07 13:11 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] filecode +14 等待解的谜 2026-08-06 19/950 2026-08-07 12:20 by wlwhappy
[基金申请] 影响面上的因素 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-05 11/550 2026-08-06 10:41 by 宝贝虫子
信息提示
请填处理意见