| ²é¿´: 545 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßjjfengnju½«ÔùËÍÄú 20 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
jjfengnju½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
¹ØÓÚEA Ñõ»¹·´Ó¦ µÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Çó°ïÖú
|
|
|
һƪÎÄÕÂͶEA£¬ºÏ³É²ÄÁÏ×öORR£¬¿ªÊ¼Á½¸öÉó¸åÈË£ºÐ޻أ¬µÚÈý¸öÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÀ´ÁË£¬¼ÌÐøÐÞ£¬ÆäÖÐÒ»ÎÊÌâÈçÏ£º Why are the limiting currents different? If the current is divided by the geometric area and the samples completely cover the substrate, similar limiting current should be expected. This point must be discussed in detail.¡± ×Ô¼º´ÓORR»ù±¾¹«Ê½½âÊÍÐ޻أ¬½á¹û20Ììºó The response provided by the authors to the comment 3 of my previous report is clearly unsatisfactory. I would recommend the authors to reconsider their response. I still suggest that the different limiting currents must be explained. Consequently, I cannot recommend this paper for publication in Electrochimica Acta Éó¸åÈ˲»ÂúÒ⣬¾Ü¸å¡£Ö÷±àÈÃÔÙ´óÐÞ£º²»ÖªµÀÈçºÎ˵·þÉó¸åÈË£º the different materials had the different limiting current densities. It is attributed to the different catalytic activity of these catalysts toward oxygen reduction reaction. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
280Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
085400 328·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶322
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũ΢ÉúÎ288·Ö£¬ÈýÄêʵÑé¾Àú
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
314Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á »¯Ñ§ 307
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõרҵһ־Ը¹þ¹¤³Ì 291·ÖBÇø ¹ú¼Ò¼¶´ó´´¸ºÔðÈË ÓÐÒ»×÷ÂÛÎÄ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ299ר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
083200 ³õÊÔ305·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
332£¬085601Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹ØÉ̼ÒÍÆ¼ö: (ÎÒÒ²ÒªÔÚÕâÀïÍÆ¹ã)
ÕÒµ½Ò»Ð©Ïà¹ØµÄ¾«»ªÌû×Ó£¬Ï£ÍûÓÐÓÃŶ~
Éó¸åÈËÌáÎÊ£ºÑ»··ü°²ÇúÏßΪʲôûÓÐÑõ»¯»¹Ô·å
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
EAÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬¼±ÇóÈçºÎ°ì£¿
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
EAͶ¸åÉó¸åËٶȺܿìÒâζ×Åʲô£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¿ÆÑдÓСľ³æ¿ªÊ¼£¬ÈËÈËΪÎÒ£¬ÎÒΪÈËÈË













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

µã»÷ÕâÀïËÑË÷¸ü¶àÏà¹Ø×ÊÔ´