| ²é¿´: 13975 | »Ø¸´: 220 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
[½»Á÷]
ÀÏÍâ°ïдµÄ»Ø¸´ÐÅ£¬¿Ï¶¨ÊÇÔ´´£¬°ï¶¥Ò»Ï¡£
|
|||
|
¸÷λ³æÓÑ£º ´ó¼ÒºÃ£¬ÎÒÊÇÎÞÒâ¼äÈÏʶСľ³æ£¬ÎÒÈÏΪÔÚСľ³æÉÏÊÕÒæÁ¼¶à£¬ÎÒµÄһƪSCI¾ÍÊÇÔÚ¸÷λ³æÓѵĹÄÀøºÍÖ§³ÖÏ·¢±íµÄ£¨Ö÷ÒªÖ§³ÖÊÇͶ¸åµÄ¸ñʽ£¬»Ø¸´ÐżþµÄ·½Ê½¼°¾«ÉñÉϵÄÖ§³Ö£©£¬ÎÒÈÏΪ¿ª³¡°×ºÜÖØÒª£¬±ðÈËÒ»¶Á¾Í·¢ÏÖ²»ÊÇnative Englishi£¬ºÜÈÝÒײúÉú·´¸Ð£¬ÈÏΪÄúÐ޸ĵIJ»×Ðϸ£¬´Ó¶ø¶ÔÐ޸ĸå×÷³ö²»ÀûµÄ¾ö¶¨¡£ÎÒÏÖÔÚ½«Ò»ÀÏÍâ°ïÎÒдµÄ»Ø¸´ÐŵĿª³¡°×½éÉܸø´ó¼Ò£¬ÎÒÈÏΪ»¹ÊǺÜÓÐÓõģ¬ÔζӢÓïµÄ¸Ð¾õ½ÏÇ¿¡£Èç¹ûÄãÈÏΪÓÐÓã¬ÇëÖ§³Öһϣ¬ºÇºÇÖ÷ÒªÊÇÒòΪÎÒ»¹ÊÇг棬Ïë׬µãÒø×Ó¡£ µÚÒ»´ÎÐ޸ĵĻظ´ÐÅ£º RESPONSES TO REVIEWERS¡¯ COMMENTS Dear Dr: We are truly grateful to yours and other reviewers¡¯ critical comments and thoughtful suggestions. Based on these comments and suggestions, we have made careful modifications on the original manuscript. All changes made to the text are in red color. In addition, we have consulted native English speakers for paper revision before the submission this time. We hope the new manuscript will meet your magazine¡¯s standard. Below you will find our point-by-point responses to the reviewers¡¯ comments/ questions: Comments from the Editor-in-Chief: »Ø¸´ºó1Ô£¬ÒªÇóСÐÝ£¬²¢ÈÏΪӢÎÄˮƽÒѾ´ó´óÌá¸ß£¬ÒªÇóÃ÷È·ÎÒÏÂÒ»²½ÏëÈçºÎÑо¿£¬Òò´ËÀÏÍâÓɰïÎÒдÁ˻ظ´ÐÅ£¬ÈçÏÂÊǵڶþ·âÐŵĿª³¡°×£º Dear Dr. Chernick: We must thank you and all other reviewers for the critical feedback. We feel lucky that our manuscript went to these reviewers as the valuable comments from them not only helped us with the improvement of our manuscript, but suggested some neat ideas for future studies. Please do forward our heartfelt thanks to these experts. Based on the comments we received, careful modifications have been made to the R1 manuscript. All changes were marked in red text. In addition, we also have a native English speakers double-checked the English for the revised R2 version. We hope the new manuscript will meet your magazine¡¯s standard. Below you will find our point-by-point responses to the reviewers¡¯ comments/ questions: |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕרҵ£¨081702£©315·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
293Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
¹¤¿Æ²ÄÁÏ085601 279Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶306Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
085601²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
sasajie
Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 428.5
- É¢½ð: 760
- Ìû×Ó: 422
- ÔÚÏß: 26.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 524351
- ×¢²á: 2008-03-13
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ö²ÎïÉúÀíÓëÉú»¯
1
|
henhao ! ¸½ÉÏÎÒдµÄcoverletter, Ò²ÊǶ«³Î÷´ÕµÄ£¬¹©´ó¼Ò²Î¿¼¡£ Dear Prof.**: Thank you very much for your kindly comments on our manuscript (No.: **). Based on your and reviewer¡¯s suggestions, we carefully revised the manuscript. We are now sending the revised article for your re-consideration to publish in Journal of Plant Physiology. Please see our point to point responses to all your comments below, and the corresponding revisions in the body of manuscript, both marked in blue. We look forward to hearing form you soon for a favorable decision. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Sincerely, *** Below, the original comments are in black, and our responses are in blue. *****¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£ |

182Â¥2008-07-19 09:07:30
xiaomu911
Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 658.3
- Ìû×Ó: 146
- ÔÚÏß: 27.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 406546
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-19
- רҵ: fiber
2Â¥2008-06-29 22:59:42
T.T.624
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 623
- Ìû×Ó: 142
- ÔÚÏß: 4.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 577837
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-27
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÌìȻҩÎﻯѧ
3Â¥2008-06-30 07:47:42
bracex
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5111.6
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 564
- ÔÚÏß: 27.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 429032
- ×¢²á: 2007-08-04
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ´ß»¯»¯Ñ§
6Â¥2008-06-30 08:03:07













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥