| 查看: 8923 | 回复: 14 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
haohaoxuexi678金虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
关于Ethical Statement的求助 已有5人参与
|
|
|
投了一个期刊，编辑发信说没有Ethical Statement，让加上。我投的是经济类期刊，怎么还有这个Ethical Statement，看到网上说什么动物实验的才需要。 另外这个申明作为单独一页放到manuscript前面行吗？投稿系统里没有专门的环节提到Ethical Statement。 以前投稿没有遇到过这个情况，也没有写过Ethical Statement，希望有经验的虫虫能提供个模板，谢谢。 编辑的信： Your submission entitled "XXXXXXX" has been received. While checking, we noticed that the Ethical Statement is missing from your submission. Without the Ethical Statement we are not allowed to process your manuscript any further. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿陕师大生物学071000，298分，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
306求0703调剂一志愿华中师范
已经有7人回复
-
333求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
335求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
336求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
303求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有6人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0703化学求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
07化学280分求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求助：Journal of Signal Processing Systems的格式要求
已经有8人回复
- 初次发SCI遇到问题求助
已经有9人回复
- Acta biomater 投稿求助
已经有3人回复
- 请问谁知道 Solid State Phys这个杂志在哪？怎么搜？
已经有2人回复
- 求ELECTRONIC LETTER 的cover letter 模版
已经有9人回复
- 急问solid state ionics 投稿需要提交Ethical Statement，这该怎么弄呢
已经有6人回复
- 急 投稿 关于 Ethical Statement Letter
已经有10人回复
Hammer_Z
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 39 (小学生)
- 金币: 1772.5
- 散金: 228
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 409
- 在线: 183.5小时
- 虫号: 3509511
- 注册: 2014-10-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 水文、水资源
4楼2015-02-28 13:58:53
shenai137
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 179 (高中生)
- 金币: 1387.2
- 散金: 800
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 514
- 在线: 85.8小时
- 虫号: 2030317
- 注册: 2012-09-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
2楼2015-02-26 19:13:38
lingyuxueer
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 302.1
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 23
- 在线: 46.7小时
- 虫号: 1434095
- 注册: 2011-10-09
- 专业: 色谱分析
3楼2015-02-28 13:14:52
Qinynn
金虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 551.7
- 帖子: 11
- 在线: 8.9小时
- 虫号: 2461921
- 注册: 2013-05-13
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 机械测试理论与技术
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
遇到跟你同样的问题，introduction for authors关于道德责任的说明是这样的 This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include: The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)). A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (e.g. “salami-publishing”). No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted. Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism. Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities - tacitly or explicitly - at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted. Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results. In addition: Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requesting to add or delete authors at revision stage, proof stage, or after publication is a serious matter and may be considered when justifiably warranted. Justification for changes in authorship must be compelling and may be considered only after receipt of written approval from all authors and a convincing, detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. In case of changes at revision stage, a letter must accompany the revised manuscript. In case of changes after acceptance or publication, the request and documentation must be sent via the Publisher to the Editor-in-Chief. In all cases, further documentation may be required to support your request. The decision on accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal and may be turned down. Therefore authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, corresponding author, and order of authors at submission. Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation following the COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been established beyond reasonable doubt, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to: If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases complete retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note. The author’s institution may be informed. |
5楼2015-03-01 14:24:53
40