应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 关于Ethical Statement的求助
51/1返回列表
查看: 8655  |  回复: 14
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

haohaoxuexi678

金虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 关于Ethical Statement的求助已有5人参与

投了一个期刊，编辑发信说没有Ethical Statement，让加上。我投的是经济类期刊，怎么还有这个Ethical Statement，看到网上说什么动物实验的才需要。

另外这个申明作为单独一页放到manuscript前面行吗？投稿系统里没有专门的环节提到Ethical Statement。

以前投稿没有遇到过这个情况，也没有写过Ethical Statement，希望有经验的虫虫能提供个模板，谢谢。


编辑的信：
Your submission entitled "XXXXXXX" has been received. While checking, we noticed that the Ethical Statement is missing from your submission. Without the Ethical Statement we are not allowed to process your manuscript any further.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
1楼2015-02-26 17:12:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Hammer_Z

木虫 (正式写手)
楼主这个问题搞定了吗？请问是怎么弄得？我也遇到这个问题了，可是introduction for authors又打不开，急死了。
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2015-02-28 13:58:53
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答

shenai137

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
这里的Ethical Statement是不是声明你是原创，没有抄袭一稿多投等情况
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2015-02-26 19:13:38
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lingyuxueer

新虫 (初入文坛)
楼主知道怎么弄了吗？可否告知一下啊

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2015-02-28 13:14:52
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Qinynn

金虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1
遇到跟你同样的问题，introduction for authors关于道德责任的说明是这样的
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.
Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include:
The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)).
A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (e.g. “salami-publishing”).
No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions
No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted.
Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.
Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities - tacitly or explicitly - at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.
In addition:
Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.
Requesting to add or delete authors at revision stage, proof stage, or after publication is a serious matter and may be considered when justifiably warranted. Justification for changes in authorship must be compelling and may be considered only after receipt of written approval from all authors and a convincing, detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. In case of changes at revision stage, a letter must accompany the revised manuscript. In case of changes after acceptance or publication, the request and documentation must be sent via the Publisher to the Editor-in-Chief. In all cases, further documentation may be required to support your request. The decision on accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal and may be turned down. Therefore authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, corresponding author, and order of authors at submission.
Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc.
If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation following the COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been established beyond reasonable doubt, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:
If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.
If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases complete retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note.
The author’s institution may be informed.
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2015-03-01 14:24:53
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭