| 查看: 1665 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
catalysis communications投稿求助，急！！！ 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
catalysis communications投了一篇文章，外审意见修改投出去到编辑手里后，一天就退回来，原文如下 Dear xxx, YOU HAVE NOT READ THE INSTRUCTIONS IN THE PREVIOUS E-MAIL. Please resubmit the revised manuscript with all the changes made in the manuscript and HIGHLIGHTED. Only then can I consider it for acceptance. ALSO, remember, the Response is not an end in itself. Your Response-to-Reviewers is not a conversation with the reviewers since they may or may not ever see your response. You MUST (1) answer their questions AND make appropriate revisions in the paper. Even if you don't add anything new, add to the text in the paper an appropriate comment, such as why you did or did not do something, or give a reference. Please resubmit the revised manuscript with all the changes made in the manuscript and highlighted. Only then can I consider it for acceptance. 外审意见我已按要求一一修改，并罗列在Response to Reviewers。不懂到底是哪里出问题了？要怎么改 之前的邮件是 Dear xxx, The reviewers, all experts in various aspects of your paper, have done a thorough evaluation of your paper and recommend major revisions in your manuscript. Thus, revision needs to address ALL issues raised and changes need to be made in the manuscript. I would be willing to reconsider your paper for publication if you address carefully and in a detailed way all ISSUES raised in your RESPONSE TO THE REVIEWERS and make appropriate corrections in your MANUSCRIPT. Please resubmit the revised manuscript with all the changes made in the manuscript and highlighted. Only then can I consider it for acceptance. For reconsideration of your manuscript, in your RESPONSE TO THE REVIEWERS you must: (1) state every issue raised by the reviewers in sequence, (2) address/rebut EACH issue/comment raised, (3) indicate how & where you have changed the manuscript. Please resubmit the revised manuscript with all the changes made in the manuscript and highlighted. Only then can I consider it for acceptance. Remember, the Response is not an end in itself. Your Response-to-Reviewers is not a conversation with the reviewers since they may or may not ever see your response. You MUST (1) answer their questions AND make appropriate revisions in the paper. Even if you don't add anything new, add to the text in the paper an appropriate comment, such as why you did or did not do something, or give a reference. NOTE: Not addressing any of the issues raised by the reviewers AND making appropriate modifications in your manuscript makes it more likely that your paper will be rejected. 请高手指点，或者给点建议。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有6人回复
-
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名（生物分析化学、药物递送）
已经有4人回复
-
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
-
自荐读博
已经有6人回复
-
青基代表作，AAAI之类的A会的special track在国内认可度高吗？还是归为workshop之流？
已经有3人回复
-
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士
已经有6人回复
-
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生
已经有4人回复
-
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有9人回复
-
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？
已经有6人回复
|
我能在弱弱的问一下 hen your paper is published on ScienceDirect, you want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. To help you get your message across, Elsevier has developed a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown (publicly available) next to your published article. This format gives you the opportunity to explain your research in your own words and attract interest. You will receive an invitation email to create an AudioSlides presentation shortly. For more information and examples, please visit http://www.elsevier.com/audioslides. 这是什么意思吗？别人说不用管，保险起见 |
14楼2015-02-17 12:26:21
1010175394
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 186.2
- 散金: 500
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 85
- 在线: 86小时
- 虫号: 1468268
- 注册: 2011-10-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 图书馆、情报与文献学其他
2楼2015-02-11 12:54:04
3楼2015-02-11 15:00:34
1010175394
铜虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 186.2
- 散金: 500
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 85
- 在线: 86小时
- 虫号: 1468268
- 注册: 2011-10-30
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 图书馆、情报与文献学其他
4楼2015-02-11 15:29:02