| 查看: 1652 | 回复: 2 | ||
[求助]
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors 怎么弄？ 已有2人参与
|
|
小弟投在springer上的Environmental Science and Pollution Research期刊的一篇文章，最近大修后，编辑来信说Ethical Statement(s) missing。查阅 Instructions for Authors，发现Ethical Responsibilities of Authors那一栏始终打不开，换了几台电脑也不行，不知怎么回事。所以现在不知道这个Ethical Responsibilities of Authors 怎么弄，是附在文章后面，还是附在回信里，或者单独上传一份Ethical Statement。但是也没有在submission里看到上传Ethical Statement的地方。请有经验的前辈指点下，若是能替我打开Instructions for Authors里Ethical Responsibilities of Authors那一栏，将杂志要求发回更好了，在此先谢过！ Instructions for Authors的地址是：http://www.springer.com/environment/journal/11356?detailsPage=pltci_1060392 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有13人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有7人回复
-
今日不放榜？网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果
已经有20人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有18人回复
-
看来今天不会放榜了？
已经有11人回复
-
时间戳又变了
已经有19人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有14人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有13人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有7人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 求助：Journal of Signal Processing Systems的格式要求
已经有8人回复
- 英文文章投稿格式
已经有5人回复
- Environmental science and pollution research有人投过吗？
已经有5人回复
- 还是通信作者的问题，有没有人知道这个到底有多重要啊？
已经有44人回复
2楼2015-02-13 10:06:33
yzc2
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7478.9
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 523
- 在线: 1061.2小时
- 虫号: 156456
- 注册: 2006-01-05
- 专业: 信息处理方法与技术
【答案】应助回帖
|
http://www.springer.com/environm ... sPage=pltci_1060392 你提到的“Instructions for Authors里Ethical Responsibilities of Authors”，打开如下： This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include: The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)). A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (e.g. “salami-publishing”). No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted. Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism. Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities - tacitly or explicitly - at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted. Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results. In addition: Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requesting to add or delete authors at revision stage, proof stage, or after publication is a serious matter and may be considered when justifiably warranted. Justification for changes in authorship must be compelling and may be considered only after receipt of written approval from all authors and a convincing, detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. In case of changes at revision stage, a letter must accompany the revised manuscript. In case of changes after acceptance or publication, the request and documentation must be sent via the Publisher to the Editor-in-Chief. In all cases, further documentation may be required to support your request. The decision on accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal and may be turned down. Therefore authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, corresponding author, and order of authors at submission. Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation following the COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been established beyond reasonable doubt, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to: If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases complete retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note. The author’s institution may be informed. |
3楼2015-02-13 18:44:19
40