24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3179  |  回复: 20
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

低垂的野花

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 投JAP大修后小修,小修后还得修改,看不懂了! 已有11人参与

Dear Mr. xxxx:
Your manuscript, referenced below, has been reviewed for publication in the Journal of Applied Physics. It has been found to be of potential interest.
However, based on reviewer comments, the recommendation is major revision.
The reviewer's comments are included below and/or attached. Please respond to the reviewer's critical comments. Please include a response letter that addresses each point and indicates how the manuscript has been revised as a separate document titled, Response Letter and submit a copy of the manuscript with the exact locations of the revisions titled, Marked Manuscript.
The revised manuscript should be returned to the Editor promptly. Your revised manuscript is due 26-Feb-2015. A manuscript returned after 26-Feb-2015 will generally be regarded as new submission and will be assigned a new receipt date.

Thank you for the opportunity to examine this work. If you have any questions, feel free to contact us at jap-edoffice@aip.org.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Manuscript #JR14-10662R1:

********************************
REQUIREMENT NOT SATISFIED:

1. Place all parts of the same figure on one page. Label all figure parts with (a), (b), etc. Avoid any large disparity in size of lettering and labels used within one illustration.
********************************

***PLEASE NOTE****
The appearance of your by-line and your author order of your data and your text is exactly the way it will be printed. Review it carefully now to ensure you are completely satisfied. No modifications will be accepted in the event your article is to be accepted for publication. Please make any needed changes promptly.
******************

Editor's Comments:


Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Publish as is
Sufficient New Physics in an Applied Area: Yes
Appropriate Length: Yes
Well Organized and Clearly Written: Yes
Good Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: Yes
Adequate References: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Good
PRESENTATION RATING: Good

Reviewer #1 (Comments to the Author):

The revised manuscript well answers my questions. So I recommend it to be published.


Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Minor Revision
Sufficient New Physics in an Applied Area: Yes
Appropriate Length: Yes
Well Organized and Clearly Written: No
Good Title: Yes
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: Yes
Adequate References: N/A
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: N/A
PRESENTATION RATING: N/A

Reviewer #2 (Comments to the Author):

The authors have addressed all scientific comments.
However, I saw many grammar errors in the manuscript. Even in the first paragraph, I saw grammar errors in the first, third, fourth and fifth sentences.
So some English editing service is needed from JAP editorial office.

第一个审稿人接受了,第二个审稿人关于语法小修,但编辑的意见是大修,虫子们有木有遇到这样的情况?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

在比喻日年

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

寸理莱德

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
其实大修小修没有那么明确的规定, 你好好按照审稿意见一条一条的改就行了。 别管他是大修还是小修, 只要是给修改都是希望很大的。
黄屋非贵,天下为忧。
11楼2015-01-29 17:36:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 21 个回答
祝福

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2015-01-29 15:38:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

waterque

金虫 (正式写手)


book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励交流~ 2015-01-29 17:04:21
把人家人家认为有语法错误的句子好好改改,应该就没什么大问题了。
行自己的路:waterque@hotmail.com
3楼2015-01-29 16:00:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖仅楼主可见
4楼2015-01-29 16:04:11
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 11/550 2026-09-02 14:15 by simwe390
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
信息提示
请填处理意见