| 查看: 1011 | 回复: 1 | ||
[求助]
荷兰的工程数学学报给回复意见了，看起来还不错，可是不知道怎么改，求助神人谢谢
|
|
直接贴审稿意见 Dear Dr. XXX, We have received the reports from our advisers on your manuscript, "XXXXXXXXXXX", submitted to Journal of XXXXXXXX Based on the advice received, the Editor has decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s). Attached, please find the reviewers' comments for your perusal. YOU ARE KINDLY REQUESTED TO ALSO CHECK THE WEBSITE FOR POSSIBLE REVIEWER ATTACHMENTS. I am looking forward to receiving your revised manuscript before 08 Mar 2015 With kind regards, David Barton, Ph.D. Associate Editor Reviewer #1: Review Report for XXXXXXX Comments for the Author: The paper presents an improvement of the aw-rascle model of vehicular traffic, which basically consists in implementing the mathematical structure the authors proposed for the derivation of models by an approximation of the pseudopressure obtained by a detailed analysis at the microscopic scale. The idea is good and leads to a model, which describes the behavior of the flow in steady uniform conditions, namely the velocity and flow diagrams. The qualitative analysis, which follows is correct. Accordingly, this paper deserves attention. Unfortunately, it does not properly refers to the existing literature, where similar ideas have been proposed although technically different from that proposed in this paper. The paper can be published after a careful revision focused on the aforementioned drawback. Bearing this in mind, the following indications are given as hallmarks for the required revisions. 然后下面是五篇文献，都是说我文中的某个现象有人用不同的方法发现过。 In conclusion, the paper can be published after an improved reference to the existing literature, while the present edition is somehow misleading. Reviewer #2: Review Report for XXXXXXX This paper proposes a modified Aw-Rascle model based on the car following principle with a maximal constraint on the density-velocity relationship. The essence is to use a nonconvex function $F(u)$ instead of $u$ in the momentum equation in the standard Aw-Rascle model, such that some complicated traffic phenomena can be captured, for example the phase transition. The authors also show that the new model develops the standard Aw-Rascle model for the reason that it amends some nonphysical features of the original one. In addition, all the Riemann solutions for the model are constructed completely by using the analysis of the convex hull in the $(\rho,q )$ phase plane which can illustrate some interesting traffic phenomena in detail. I believe that the model is new and interesting in the traffic flow theory and the result seems correct to me. But there needs some corrections of language, for example (1) On page 1, line -6, "the density and the velocity all" should be "both the density and the velocity". (2) On page 2, line 8, "there is still some" should be "there are still some". (3) On page 2, line -3, "which envelop curve you chose the solution of some riemann problems" should be "which envelope curve you choose the solution of some Riemann problems". (4) On page 5, line 8, "Take (2.2) into (2.3)" should be "Taking (2.2) into (2.3)". (5) On page 6, line 11, "It is naturally that" should be "It is natural that". (6) On page 7, line 5, "In order to analysis" should be "In order to analyze". Besides these comments, I recommend the manuscript for publication in Journal of Engineering Mathematics. 所以我现在的问题是，怎么改啊？语言错误好修改，但是这个关于引用文献，我是只要添加这五篇，并且在introduction中体现呢，还是要更多的文献（包含他说的五篇）支撑？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
朋友圈看到的
已经有9人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有13人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有16人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有17人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有19人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有4人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有11人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有6人回复
-
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有14人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有17人回复
2楼2015-01-28 16:08:21
20