24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2537  |  回复: 20
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

南风吹

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)


[交流] energy&fuels 修改意见回复求助!!!

给了我如下的意见:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. Two of the reviewers have expressed reservations about experimental measurements and analysis. I don’t believe these could be addressed through a standard major revision and I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels in its current form.
However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a new version submitted as a resubmission to this manuscript. Please upload a point by point response to all reviewer comments if you decide to resubmit.
With sincere regards,
Dr. John Shaw
Associate Editor
Journal of Energy & Fuels
Phone: 780-492-8236
Fax: 12023544717
Email: jmshaw@efuels.acs.org
------------------------------------
Reviewer Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions.
Comments:
Review attached
Additional Questions:
Originality: Good
Technical Quality: Good
Clarity of Presentation: Good
Importance to Field: Good
Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Publish after major revisions.
Comments:
Please see the attachment for the review.
Additional Questions:
Originality: Fair
Technical Quality: Fair
Clarity of Presentation: Fair
Importance to Field: Good
Reviewer: 3
Recommendation: Publish after minor revisions.
Comments:
the research show very important resuts, but the terpolymer products, how about the purification should be more clear.
Additional Questions:
Originality: Good
Technical Quality: Good
Clarity of Presentation: Fair
Importance to Field: Good
但是没有给修改周期,还有如果是这样这篇文章接受有戏吗?第一次投文章很是不懂,谢谢各位大神!!!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wdlgezi

金虫 (正式写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
20楼: Originally posted by 南风吹 at 2015-01-12 15:15:12
如果是重投,接收有戏吗?...

重投相当于重新来过,不好,只能说都有可能。祝好!

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
21楼2015-01-12 16:20:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 21 个回答

ssssllllnnnn

至尊木虫 (知名作家)



南风吹(金币+1): 谢谢参与
不是让你修改哪来的修改周期?

是在补充实验等的基础上欢迎重新投稿,不是修改。
2楼2015-01-09 10:14:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

confipeng

新虫 (小有名气)


★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
自私的猫1988: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2015-01-10 08:32:00
如果觉得意见都中肯,能改。那就比较有希望,祝福!

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
13楼2015-01-09 12:20:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wdlgezi

金虫 (正式写手)


★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
自私的猫1988: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2015-01-10 08:31:54
我的理解: 第一段话,编辑觉得基于审稿人的意见,不看好你基于原稿的大修,即拒稿。第二段话,如果你想彻底大修,那编辑建议你按照审稿人意见一一解决问题,并重投。

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
14楼2015-01-09 19:50:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见